Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 12:00:14 +0300
From: "Manos Manoli" <manos@ma*.co*.cy*>
To: Tech Diver <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: DIR Jackpot!
That is what i call� "Bandwith waste" Can someone shoot this guy ?
I started to think that Black is not even a diver.

Manos
�
�

"Michael J. Black" wrote:

> Wow!!!� Bagged an elephant this time!� I'd better think of something
> good to respond to all the DIR hotheads with their "panties in a such
> a bunch" (thanks Trey, I learned that one from you).� First of all
> I am not trimix-certified, and believe it or not, one reason is I have
> an objection to TDI's requirement that Extended Range (on air) precede
> Trimix.� There are very limited opportunities to get trimix-certification
> in my area, but that is slowly changing.� I will not divulge how deep
> I have been on air, as if I haven't been crucified enough already.� Ha!!
> As I said in my introduction, my technical diving has been wreck, ice,
> advanced nitrox (TDI), decompression procedures (TDI), some cave (dived
> Akumal in early 80's, but wasn't cave-certified), and let's just say
> some "deep" air.� Diving medicine has been a second hobby, and I have
> been fortunate to have learned from some experts, whose names have
> already been bashed on this list, so keep guessing.
>
> Now listen up DIR clones.� You are still the bad guys.� Techdiver's
> reputation still sucks thanks to you loudmouthed jerks, and you damn
> well know it.� As I've said before, kicking this hornet's nest is just
> a scream, because there are so many holes in your system (with the
> biggest hole being your militant attitude) that you deserve to be
> bashed, eternal-damnation style.� And just so you don't hurt yourselves
> laughing too hard after reading this post, chew on this (a new myth fer
> ya):
>
> DIR:� Myths & Realities (3rd update)
>
> Myth 9:� George Irvine, DIR's founder, really cares about people and
> wants to help others recognize the error in their ways.� Reality:� Mr.
> Irvine is recognized worldwide first as a man who verbally attacks
> anyone who disagrees with his ideas, and secondly as the man who
> developed the DIR system of diving.� His internet postings are indicative
> of a paranoid sociopathic personality disorder, and typically such an
> individual has little or no conscience, and is not capable of caring
> or helping.
>
> To Review (once more):
>
> Myth 8:� DIR and its proponents have saved many student divers from
> certain danger and possible death, as taught by all other training
> agencies.� Reality:� No agency is trying to kill you.� The agencies
> that have been in the business longest have enviable safety records,
> a testimonial to their quality of instruction, given the inherent
> dangers involved in scuba.
>
> Myth 7:� DIR is a system for everybody.� Reality:� Personal preference
> is the system for everybody.� You have the right to choose DIR or the
> right to choose another system, or to incorporate useful parts of any
> system that suits your needs.� No single system will ever be the panacea
> for everybody.
>
> Myth 6:� DIR is a system based on experience and proven facts.� Reality:
> Although many DIR divers have experience in technical diving, there are
> many among them who extrapolate facts to the point of distortion,
> confusion, and lack of truth.� The message soon becomes lost in all
> the noise.
>
> Myth 5:� DIR is a new movement in scuba that will grow and someday
> surpass other systems.� Reality:� Tech diving will continue to grow,
> but the training agencies that will attract the most students are the
> ones with time-honored teaching skills, including respect, patience,
> and avoidance of name-calling such as DIR's infamous "stroke."
>
> Myth 4:� DIR is practised by the BEST divers in the world.� Reality:
> The BEST divers in the world are too busy diving and conducting research
> to be sitting around posting to techdiver, rec.scuba, the GUE list,
> Rodale's, or any other newsgroup in cyberspace.� The BEST divers in the
> world, with few exceptions, are conspicuously absent from these lists.
>
> Myth 3:� DIR uses safe procedures, both in and out of the water.
> Reality:� DIR uses procedures that do not comply with guidelines established
> by NOAA and the U.S. Navy, including flying only three hours after a deep
> deco dive, in-water recompression for decompression accidents, diving
> well beyond recreational limits and simultaneously striving to shorten
> decompression times, exercising shortly after diving, plus others which
> are hardly safe.
>
> Myth 2:� DIR is useful for cave diving, but can be applied to ALL forms
> of diving.� Reality:� Very few people use DIR outside of cave diving,
> because the system is inflexible and impractical.� In fact DIR teaches
> using NO COMPUTER, only a bottom timer, hardly a practical recommendation
> nowadays.
>
> Myth 1:� DIR has had no fatalities or accidents.� Reality:� Bobby
McGuirre,
> a WKPP/DIR diver, died while diving DIR in a cave, and represents at least
> one accident DIR cannot deny.
>
> MJB :-)))
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
> http://invites.yahoo.com/
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]