Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: techdiver@opal.com
Subject: Re: Reduced air Nitrox ?
From: David Giddy <d.giddy@tr*.oz*.au*>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 10:39:31 +1100
Richard and others,

Thanks for your comments. To those who asked, I don't have references to the
work on narcotic potency of oxygen vs nitrogen. All I know about it is what
others have mentioned here on techdiver. Maybe John Crea or Chris Parrett
can provide references ?

On the issue of depth, I perhaps shouldn't have mentioned the air diving
records of Gilliam et al. The depth range I would like the discussion to
focus on is the 50-80m (160'-260') range. This is a range that quite a few
people push air diving into (see "Deep Diving" by Gilliam).

Richard Pyle <deepreef@bi*.bi*.Ha*.Or*> writes:
>
>On Mon, 6 Feb 1995, David Giddy wrote:
>
>> Has anyone tried an alternative of Reduced air Nitrox ? By this I mean air
>> to which *Nitrogen* has been *added* to reduce the FO2.
>
>The interesting thing about air (Nitrox-21) is that it happens to be about
>the optimum blend for deep diving of any nitrogen and oxygen mixture. The
>reason for this is that both oxygen toxicity and narcotic limits for most
>people are achieved at about the same depth when breathing air.  Many
>people prefer to limit their oxygen exposure to about 1.4 ATA, which on
>air occurs at about 190fsw, at which depth most people are feeling strong
>effects of narcosis.  A few people set their PO2 limit at 1.6ATA,
>which is ~220fsw on air, a depth where only a very few individuals are not
>seriously incapacitated by narcosis.  In other words, O2 toxicity and
>narcosis are almost equally limiting factors for depth when breathing air.

Agreed. However, for those people who do wish to push air deeper, I think that
it would be safer to reduce the chance of O2 toxicity and have narcosis as the
limiting factor.

>
[deleted]
>
>I actually believe that breathing Nitrox-10 at, say 240fsw, would be
>slightly less narcotic than breathing air at 240fsw (nothing to back this
>up...just a hunch).  But what would the point be?  Any reduction in
>narcosis would be subtle, at best, and would likely be dwarfed by other
>variables affecting narcosis intensity (water temp, CO2 buildup, water
>clarity, etc).

I think the point is not to reduce narcosis, but to reduce the O2 risk
significantly while *not increasing* the narcosis level.

>
>It's true that the risk of acute O2 toxicity might be reduced somewhat,
>but that becomes unimportant if narcosis is incapacitating. Although a few
>individuals like Bret Gilliam, Dan Manion, and others have pushed beyond
>400 or even 500 fsw and lived to tell about it, even they wouldn't
>advocate nitrogen/oxygen bimixes as a *practical* breathing gas for deep
>water.

I guess it depends on the depth range you are aiming for. 

My primary suggestion is that in the range of 50-80m (160'-260'), something like
Nitrox-10 or even Nitrox-5 may be a safer breathing gas than air. 
(To those who wrote about using Trimix and Heliox: I fully realise that they
 would be even safer, but that is not the point I am interested in exploring)

>
>I'm sorry if this doesn't satisfactorily answer the question...I'd sum up
>by saying that: any advantages gained by increasing the nitrogen content
>of air at deeper depths are tiny compared with the advantages of diluting
>air with helium (even when considering the relative price of the two
>gases).  So, except for some highly unusual situations, it would be better
>to use air, trimix, or heliox for deeper dives.

The interest may be particularly local as here in Australia, medical grade
Helium is roughly 5 times the price of medical grade oxygen. In addition, there
are as yet very few places which will provide Trimix and Heliox fills.

Cheers,

David.
______________________________________________________________________________
David Giddy,			                 |    Voice: +61 3 253 6388
Telstra Corporation,                             |      Fax: +61 3 253 6144
P.O. Box 249, Rosebank MDC, 3169, AUSTRALIA      | Internet: d.giddy@tr*.oz*.au*
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]