no, OMS is definitely not hot dip galv. That is what PST is. ---------- > From: Scott <scottk@hc*.co*> > To: armantrout@at*.ne* > Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com > Subject: Re: OMS vs. PST > Date: Friday, March 17, 2000 8:28 AM > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <armantrout@at*.ne*> > To: "Jeremy Parker" <o2toxed@ho*.co*> > Cc: <armantrout@wo*.at*.ne*>; <techdiver@aquanaut.com> > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 11:25 AM > Subject: Re: OMS vs. PST > > <snip> > > > >If I did not need the > > weight, I would find a rig that would do the job, but > > would hate to buy OMS because once you scratch the > > paint, they are ruined. > > > > Now, it may just be my imagination, but I think the > > paint on Faber tanks holds up better than OMS. Is it > > the same paint job? Anybody know? > > The OMS tanks are hot dip galvanized. Fabers are powder coated (I think....) > and the coating seems to be very durable. I have been abusing mine for > better than 6 months now, and I am still no through the primer coat. > > Scott > -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]