Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Jesse Armantrout" <armantrout@wo*.at*.ne*>
To: "Scott" <scottk@hc*.co*>, <armantrout@at*.ne*>
Cc: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: OMS vs. PST
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:09:48 -0600
no, OMS is definitely not hot dip galv.  That is what PST is.

----------
> From: Scott <scottk@hc*.co*>
> To: armantrout@at*.ne*
> Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com
> Subject: Re: OMS vs. PST
> Date: Friday, March 17, 2000 8:28 AM
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <armantrout@at*.ne*>
> To: "Jeremy Parker" <o2toxed@ho*.co*>
> Cc: <armantrout@wo*.at*.ne*>; <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 11:25 AM
> Subject: Re: OMS vs. PST
> 
> <snip>
> 
> 
> >If I did not need the
> > weight, I would find a rig that would do the job, but
> > would hate to buy OMS because once you scratch the
> > paint, they are ruined.
> >
> > Now, it may just be my imagination, but I think the
> > paint on Faber tanks holds up better than OMS.  Is it
> > the same paint job?  Anybody know?
> 
> The OMS tanks are hot dip galvanized. Fabers are powder coated (I
think....)
> and the coating seems to be very durable. I have been abusing mine for
> better than 6 months now, and I am still no through the primer coat.
> 
> Scott
> 
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]