Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: rab@ju*.ne* (Ross Bagley)
Subject: Newbie buying Doubles (OMS vs. PST)
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 17:58:17 -0600 (CST)
This is the upgrading of a discussion on rec.scuba...

I am a relative SCUBA newbie, but trying to get the right equipment
the second time around (Zeagle Ranger currently for sale on eBay to
make space for a Halcyon rig).  I want to build my first doubles rig
so that when I am experienced enough to benefit from GUE in a few
years, I've already been diving the blessed gear for years in open
water and am completely comfortable with it.  To that end, I have
asked which steel tanks are preferred by DIR divers on rec.scuba.

I have gotten about equal responses for Faber/OMS and PST, but one
person indicated that PST were the WKPP/DIR "blessed" tanks because of
their bouyancy characteristics.  I wanted clarification on this but
nobody on rec.scuba has stepped forward with anything compelling, so
I'm hoping that the guys who really do the diving can help me out.

OMS 98's are neutral when empty, PST 104's are -2.5lbs when empty.  My
contention is that a heavier backplate or v-weight will allow a diver
to have exactly the same bouyancy, but with better trim, as the weight
will be closer to the center of mass if it's in the backplate than if
it's in the tanks (shorter inverting moment).  Completely theoretical
argument as I have only dived the OMS 98's (and did that wet) with no
comparison to the PST's.  If the argument doesn't hold water, I would
love to understand why.

Another point is that locally, most/all of the people I would want to
dive with (those who have gone to or expressed interest in GUE
training) own Faber/OMS tanks.  I don't think that the gear similarity
part of DIR buddy equipment selection has to extend to the tanks as
well, but I could be wrong on that as well...

Finally, OMS might not use hot dip galvanizing, which would make their
corrosion protection clearly inferior to PST, though I am contacting
OMS directly to determine what they actually do for their galvanizing
process.

Thanks for any assistance,
Ross

-- Ross Bagley & Associates  http://www.rossbagley.com
"We don't write your software, we help you write your software better!"
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]