Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: uunet!opal.com!techdiver@uunet.UU.NET
Subject: Re: Mix questions
From: csfb1!phantom!wrolf@uu*.UU*.NE* (Wrolf Courtney)
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 93 13:41:44 EDT
>From uunet!opal.com!owner-techdiver Mon Sep 20 13:11:16 1993
>Return-Path: <uunet!opal.com!owner-techdiver>
>Received: from csfb1 by phantom.fir.fbc.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
>	id AA03975; Mon, 20 Sep 93 13:11:14 EDT
>Errors-To: uunet!opal.com!owner-techdiver
>Received: from uunet.UUCP by csfb1 (4.1/SMI-4.1)
>	id AA13664; Mon, 20 Sep 93 13:11:20 EDT
>Errors-To: uunet!opal.com!owner-techdiver
>Received: from fulton.opal.com (via gw.opal.com) by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP 
>	(5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA04014; Mon, 20 Sep 93 12:20:49 -0400
>Received: from localhost (root@lo*) by fulton.opal.com (8.5/2.8)
>	id MAA24687; Mon, 20 Sep 1993 12:13:56 -0400
>Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1993 17:12:19 +0100
>From: Gordon Henderson <uunet!meiko.co.uk!gordon>
>Subject: Re: Mix questions
>Message-Id: <199309201612.AA27248@hu*.me*.co*.uk*>
>Precedence: bulk
>Errors-To: uunet!opal.com!owner-techdiver
>To: techdiver@opal.com
>Received: from hub.meiko.co.uk (hub.meiko.co.uk [192.131.108.80]) by
fulton.opal.com (8.5/2.8) with SMTP
>	id MAA24671; Mon, 20 Sep 1993 12:13:51 -0400
>Received: from rigel.co.uk (rigel.meiko.co.uk) by hub.meiko.co.uk with SMTP id
AA27248
>	(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for techdiver@opal.com); Mon, 20 Sep 1993 17:12:19 +0100
>X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
>Status: R
>
>Tracey Baker, <tab@go*.at*.co*> writes:
>> I'm playing with some gas mixing algorithms, [-edit-]
>> to get really accurate numbers for partial pressure mixing. [-edit-]
>> how it's done in the real world...
>
>Is parial pressure mixing a good thing?
>
>My local shop always uses an analyser for Nitrox (and trimix, I guess)
>mixes. The chap who does the mixing (currently) starts with an empty
>bottle and he knows that for a final mix of X% O2, he needs to start
>with Y bar of pure O2, then top it up to final pressure with air, then
>analyse and cut back by emptying a little out of the bottle and topping
>up with air and testing again.
>
>I've watched him do this fairly often - He deliberately adds a little
>too much O2 so he can cut back to the exact final mix (No O2 booster
>yet, but he's working on it!)
>
>His meter is accurate to 0.1% - I don't think that you could get that
>accurate by partial pressure mixing - Or can you? Does anyone do it
>this way and consistently get accurate results?
>
>Gordon

This *is* the method of partial pressures.

Wrolf

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]