Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:07:32 -0500
From: trey@ne*.co* (Trey)
To: Steven Bliim <Steven.Bliim@Mc*.co*.au*>
CC: "'Scott Hunsucker'" <swhac@pc*.gu*.ne*>, techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: Pulmonary swelling
Steve, this is more than our comes at, and you do not need it any higher
or even that high. I usully put 2000 psi in a low pressure 95 and that
lasts 150-180 minutes.


Steven Bliim wrote:
> 
> Scott
> 
> While I agree that 100% O2 is the optimal gas for decompression I might just
> suggest that another reason that 80% is used is related to the pressure at
> which O2 is available not just an inability to remain at 20 fsw / 6 msw. I
> don't know the position in the USA but as I understand the position here in
> Australia commercial O2 comes at about a maximum of 180 bar. While some
> people in Sydney may have Haskels they are not readily available. If some
> one knows where one can readily get one's O2 at 200 bar or that I have got
> it totaly wrong I'm sure that they will let me know. What's more I will be
> glad to be corrected.
> 
> Regards
> Steve Bliim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Hunsucker [mailto:swhac@pc*.gu*.ne*]
> Sent: Friday, 18 February 2000 0:50
> To: Mike Wallace; techdiver@aquanaut.com
> Subject: Re: Pulmonary swelling
> 
> Mike,
>    This is one of the upcoming discussions planned with the oxygen series of
> posts.  I plan on putting out CNS tonight, then pulmonary, then negative
> affects of O2, then how we handle the risk, and finally things that we have
> learned to make usage safer.  If you can wait a  couple of days I will get
> to your question.
>    I will say in brief that most people using 80% do so because they have
> done it for a while, or those that trained them did it that way.  As I will
> hopefully point out, 100% is the optimum gas for decompression.  Then again
> many people advocate the use of 80% because they can't stay at 20 FSW so
> what does that tell you?
> Scott Hunsucker
> 
> At 09:18 PM 02/16/2000 -0600, Mike Wallace wrote:
> 
> Anyone have any information or knowledge of studies of pulmonary swelling as
> a result of 100% O2 for deco purposes? It's my understanding that this is
> one reason that is given for using 80% rather than 100% for deco.
> 
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]