Having an MD publish a paper is not going to hack it! U have ample proof of that. As for the tenets of O2 toxicity. Limiting disc to pulmonary O2 tox. It is possible to exceed, w/i reason, the 'safe pulmonary dose' guidelines w/o out long term ill effects. It is just a matter of the amount of the discomfort one is willing to put up w/. (Paranthetically the jury is out on the true long term effects - the carcinogenic effects of free radicals). It is also possible to change the threshold of the ill effects of HBO or prolong the latent period w/ mediactions that scavenge free-radicals, the agents currently held to B causal in oxtox. Nutrients additives have also been suggested. As stated above it is thought tht it is the excessive free radicals produced w/ HBO tht R the cause of the pathogenesis. The enzymes involved in scavenging, like SOD, R considered induceable enzymes, meaning that their titer increases as [substrate] increases. Though this may not reduce the [free radical], it will tend to maintain a steady state, thus delaying overt symptomalogy. Still, it is also incontravertible that many if not all divers, WKPP divers included, do report 'chest burning' when exposed to protracted deco w/ high ppO2. Maneouvers like air breaks do ameliorate this but do not show up in the stnd OTU calculations wh/ require a 24 h break before the pulmonary clock is set to 0. Thus the calc values R artificially elevated relative to actual expo values. New data always becomes available. The validity of the data depends on not who publishes it but whether it can B reproduced by an independent investigator. Obviously all the details of the protocols used to generate the data have to B made avialble for that to happen. Safe bubbles Esat Atikkan --- Mat Bloedorn <mbloedorn@ya*.co*> wrote: > Michael, > > You seem to think that everything there is to know > about high PO2 has already been written and > that there is nothing to be learned anymore. You of > all people should know this is never the > case. > > Who are you to say that what is currently know about > O2 exposure is all there is to know? > > Or are you saying that if the WKPP get an MD to > publish a paper then their methods will be valid > in your eyes? > > Mat. > > --- "Michael J. Black" <mjblackmd@ya*.co*> wrote: > > The quick version: > > > > Mr. Hunsucker says it's not OK to speed with your > car (exceed > > pO2 1.6), but it is OK to run stop signs (exceed > 100% CNS clock, up > > to 20,000%). > > > > The dirty version: > > > > Your account is seriously past due, please pay > immediately (WKPP > > divers are going to get hurt, and are lucky to > have made it this far > > if you listen to Mr. Hunsucker). > > > > The safe version: > > > > Do not speed or run stop signs. Both can get you > hurt. MJB > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. > > http://im.yahoo.com > > -- > > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to > `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to > `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. > > > > ===== > M-Plan - Free-Ware dive planning software utilizing > Gradient Factors & the Buhlmann ZHL-16 algorithm at: > mailto:mbloedorn@ya*.co* > http://www3.sympatico.ca/bloedorn > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. > http://im.yahoo.com > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to > `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to > `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]