> > On Wed, 25 Jan 1995, Leslie Wilk wrote: > > I'm puzzled by your final comment. As you state, Buhlmann's tables are > > built from the algorithm by forcing the initial descent to be instantaneous, > > but they are USED by including the descent time in your time-at-depth. > > From a TABLE point of view that is conservative. With respect to the ALGORITHM, > > if you constrain it to a fixed descent rate (say, 60 fpm), shouldn't exceeding > > that rate get you to depth with a lower tissue-load than the algorithm computes, > > thus also being conservative? Reply from Ronnie Bell; > Wel, IMHO not really. It seems you are making the assumption that the > consarvatism added to the true dive time/depth gas loading calculations > is "fluff". ???I don't understand how you arrived at that conclusion. I would certainly never dismiss conservatism as "fluff". My question was a purely mathematical one, and is independent of any conservatism that might already have been built into the algorithm. Les Wilk
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]