Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Claudia Milz" <cmilz@Mi*.ED*>
Organization: CSM
To: John Brett <JohnB@pi*.co*>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:50:41 -7:00
Subject: RE: NARCOTIC 02
CC: techdiver@aquanaut.com
John,

> Bennett & Elliot has a discussion of the Meyer-Overton hypothesis.
> Applying it to O2 gives you a narc pot. of ~2.
> Assigning O2 a narc pot. of 1 makes the calculations simple
> (drop the whole concept of equivalent nitrogen depth, and use equivalent
> air depths). Alternatively, I believe GMIII considers O2 more narcotic than
> N2 - which is consistent with the MO hyp & high(ish) ppO2s.

Thanks for the data, that is quite interesting. About 6 weeks ago I 
played guinea pig for a medical study, conducted in a pressure 
chamber. The highest ppO2 we had to inhale for approx. 20 minutes 
(due to delays of the following physical) was 3.0. Nobody in the 
chamber developed *any* problem, neither convulsions nor narcosis of 
any kind occurred.  Does the book mention any contributing parameters 
for the ppO2 of about 2.?  

Claudia
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]