Carl Heinzl <cgh@ma*.ai*.mi*.ed*> wrote:- > A little more on the "propeller" idea... Propellers add rotational momentum > to the water. Isn't then, an impeller more efficient (and, obviously safer) > than a propeller? I cannot comment on jet boats, but on jet skis, the water > is propelled almost directly backward. In addition there is a "pump" that > removes most of the rotational energy from the water. -Carl- If the waterjet is produced by an impeller (= a propeller in a chamber), much of the water that is sent sideways is still likely to end up as turbulence and thus finally as warming the water, than as propulsive backblast.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]