Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Paltz, Art" <Art.Paltz@R2*.CO*>
To: kirvine@sa*.ne*, "Shimell, David (shimell)" <shimell@se*.co*>
Cc: QUEST@GU*.CO*, techdiver <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: RE: SAMPLE DECO DIVE - 220 FOR 25
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 09:10:40 -0500
George,

Can you elaborate on Oxygen Exposure?  I remember you saying many times that
OTU's and CNS clock's are BS.  How do you track this?  What about repetitive
dives?

If you covered this before in the thread I apologize, I must have been
snoozing...

Thanks,
Art.


	-----Original Message-----
	From:	kirvine@sa*.ne* [SMTP:kirvine@sa*.ne*]
	Sent:	Wednesday, December 29, 1999 2:26 PM
	To:	Shimell, David (shimell)
	Cc:	QUEST@GU*.CO*; techdiver
	Subject:	Re: SAMPLE DECO DIVE - 220 FOR 25

	I ignore the first dive - in this case you have mushed the bubbles
	anyway. After enough time, I ignore any first dive other than as
regards
	the oxygen exposure - that is where the risk lies. 

	Shimell, David (shimell) wrote:
	> 
	> George
	> 
	> Here's another question.
	> 
	> Say you do your 220' for 25 and then ascend to do a multi-level
dive to say
	> 90' for 25.  How would you calculate the deco for this?  I recall
you once
	> talked about superimposing one table on another but I had it on my
list of
	> things to look at.
	> 
	> David Shimell
	> Email: shimell@se*.co* <mailto:shimell@se*.co*>
	> Project Manager, IBM NUMA-Q, Sequent Computer Systems Limited,
	> Weybridge Business Park, Addlestone Road, Weybridge, Surrey, KT15
2UF, UK
	> registered in England and Wales under company number: 1999363,
registered
	> office as above
	> 
	> -----Original Message-----
	> From:   kirvine@sa*.ne* [SMTP:kirvine@sa*.ne*]
	> Sent:   Friday, December 24, 1999 12:43 PM
	> To:     QUEST@GU*.CO*
	> Cc:     techdiver
	> Subject:        SAMPLE DECO DIVE - 220 FOR 25
	> 
	> Let's run through a sample dive. I will throw out the parameters
and
	> the standeard deco on one side, and my changes and why on the
other ,and
	> then we can discuss it.
	> 
	>  We can then build the dive into a longer dive, a deeper dive and
we can
	> add more gasses and more stituations, and then the equipment to do
it.
	> 
	>  Let's start with this and get the discussion going that way. I
need all
	> questions, no matter how sophisticated, so we can get out the
rock.
	> 
	> ***PROFILE 220 FOR 25                   CHANGES
	> ***GAS 16% OXYGEN  50% HELIUM   1.2 PPO2
	>                                 85 AED
	> 
	>          REASON FOR GAS CHOICE: the more heluim, the better . It
is
	> easier to breathe at depth, and it is easier to decompress from,
	> contrary to what you have been told elsewhere. The reduced narc is
	> obvious. I chose the 50% heliuum for this , but the more the
better. The
	> oxygen ppo2 should be kept intentionally low. The reason is that
you do
	> not want to unnecessarily deplete brain chemistry to pick up
"perceived"
	> deco advantage, expescially in light of the fact that we have
boosted
	> the helium which reduces the nitrogen damage and loading, and thus
the
	> deco requirement. While inert gas is inert gas for purposes of
this
	> discussion ( or said another way, the oxygen window is the oxygen
	> window) the reality is that helium changes the physiological
factors
	> that are as real in deco as the straight compartment loading and
	> unloading factors. Very important to us in our diving, and more so
as
	> the dives get more severe or repetitive. We also do not want to
burn the
	> shit out of our lungs with high PPO2's either, and keep in mind
that
	> depending on the bottom time, we are going to be forced to expose
	> ourselves ot elevated oxygen to decompress.
	> 
	> It is critical in multiday exposure that you reduce the oxygen
dose, and
	> we will show how to do that in each decompression.
	> 
	> STANDARD DECO FROM A PROGRAM            REAL LIFE DECO
	> 
	> DEPTH   TIME    GAS                     DEPTH   TIME    GAS
	>                                         160-120 1 MINUTE EACH ON
BG
	> 110     1       16/50                   110     1
	> 100     3                               100     1
	> 90      4                               90      1
	> 80      5                               80      1
	> 70      3       50/50                   70      5       50/50
	> 60      4                               60      2
	> 50      5                               50      3
	> 40      9                               40      5
	> 30      11                              30      8
	> 20      17      OXYGEN                  20      13      OXYGEN
	> 10      26                              20-0    8
	> 
	> TOTAL 88                                TOTAL   60
	> 
	>                     REASONS FOR CHANGES
	> 
	> 1) we start our deco at 80% of the profile in atmospheres, or in
this
	> case , around 160 feet. We are not changing gases yet, so no
reason to
	> sit on these stops. The ascent rate is 30 fpm, or the equivalent
of a 20
	> second stop every ten feet from the bottom, so we are really only
adding
	> 40 seconds per "stop" from 80% of the profile. This actually
"maxes out"
	> at about 5 minutes per "deep stop" in anything approaching
saturations,
	> which I call 150 minutes for the purposes of decomprssion reality
as
	> opposed to trying to decompress a whale. In a long dive, we also
use the
	> first deco gas at 80% of the profile . Not in play here.
	> 
	> 2) moving up we do not extend these stops per Bulhmann, since we
have
	> already moved the "ceiling" quite a long ways above us, and are
not yet
	> really pressing the gradient ( in percentage or relative terms, ie
the
	> ratio of the atmospheric change deep a opposed to shallow). We
need to
	> get to a deco gas first and spend some time, so......
	> 
	> 3) we "SIT" on the 70 foot stop for quite a bit longer than is
suggested
	> by theory. The reason is we want to use that wide open oxygen
window for
	> all it is worth down there to both clear the slate as much as
possible,
	> and to move that ceiling again quite a bit so that we can
abbreviate the
	> stops above as their ppo2 declines, rather than lengthening them
as
	> either Bulhmann or bubble mechanics would indicate - real life
says we
	> are correct. In fact, I have SKIPPED up to 100 minutes of our 40
foot
	> stops with no repercussions, and Lucy Ho can vouch for me on this
( and
	> the doppler says so). The other reason is that we want to give the
blood
	> a chance to totally circulate with the new gas. While it hits the
key
	> body parts immediately ( spine, heart, brain), it takes a couple
of
	> minutes to get to everything properly. We do not want to hammer
high
	> popo2's, we want to use them to our advanntage.
	> 
	> 3) since we have done our deep stops and our high ppo2's, both
moving
	> our ceiling and shortening our upper time, we can go ahead and
press the
	> gradient as it condenses, and shorten the next few stops and get
to that
	> oxygen.
	> 
	> 4) the oxygen does not have to be hit too ahrd. I like 12-13
minute
	> stints with 6-8 minutes off. The reasons are that it takes almost
no
	> time to saturate with oxygen at any ppo2 once the immediate
offgassing
	> slows - a few minutes - and the damage starts to accrue after
about
	> 16-20 minutes in our experience, depending of course on the
dosages
	> already taken on the way up to this point.  The swelling of the
lung
	> tissue picks up after a few minutes, and the gas transfer process
is
	> severely hampered. Vasoconstriction gets worse, and you are
pissing in
	> the wind honking on the oxygen. You need to break to back gas, or
in
	> this case , just move up and get out.
	> 
	> 5) slow final ascent - the last move up to the surface is one of
the
	> most critical. No matter how long you sit on a stop with the
window wide
	> open, there will still be gas that will not be displaced by this
method.
	> When you increase the gradient by trying to surface, the last of
the gas
	> comes out rapidly and does so in bubble form. You must do a slow
ascent
	> to reduce the risk of this, and for long dive it is one foot per
minute
	> to the surface, for this dive it is more like 2.5 - 3 fpm.
	> 
	> 6) at the surface, sit still for a bit and try not to exert for
about 30
	> minutes thereafter. Bubbles forming at this time will now grow as
they
	> pick up offgassing nitrogen ( the helium is long gone) and will
become
	> problematic later, and severely so if you have a shunt that can
then be
	> opened by the in increasing pressure on the cappillary beds of the
	> lungs.
	> 
	> OK - let's take it from here and get the discusion going.  Please
do not
	> copy back the whole message or it will become a mail bonb - just
cut and
	> paste the parts you want to discuss, and lets discuss one item per
	> email, SVP. When we expand this to a long dive, then I will cross
copy
	> it to WKPP@eg*.co*, and we will bring in the big guns ( Rose,
Mee
	> ,et al).
	> 
	> Let's go .
	> 
	> --
	> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to
`techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
	> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to
`techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

	--
	Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to
`techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
	Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to
`techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]