Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <kirvine@sa*.ne*>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 18:04:48 -0500
To: Rob Murray <robworld@ad*.ne*>
CC: techdiver <techdiver@aquanaut.com>, QUEST@gu*.co*
Subject: lenght of intermediate stops Re: SAMPLE DECO DIVE - 220 FOR 25
Yes, everything pretty well maxes out quickly. 150 minutes bottom time
is the beginning of the max zone. Intermediate stops become counter
productive beyond a certain point, and you just get cold and take a ppo2
beating. I move up and use the gradient to the max. I like that strategy
especially well in light of the fact that we have such a huge oxygen
exposure at that point that if we toxed, I would want to be well past a
lot of the deco and not have incurred a bunch of loading at those depths
so as to have a better chance of living through an emergency surfacing.
I feel a lot better when I have decompresesed to within 40 or 50 feet of
the surface. Time there seems like home free to me. Hanging out there
does nothing in my opinion - no window, no real change in ceiling per
time , moving the gradient is the best aggressive move.

 Personally, and I am not recommending this to anyone else, I basicly
blow off the 40 foot stop almost completely , as in do 20 out of 120
minutes and move up to the 30 foot oxygen in the habitat, or jump the 40
, do a skimpy 30 and do the oxygen at 20 for inwater dives. If I get
wacked there, I just drop back down and try again in theroy, but in
reality , when I do get wacked doing that , I stick it out and it goes
away in minutes, like 3 or 4 minutes. I generally hold real still if I
suspect it and then I am fine. Again, I am not suggesting anyone else
should do that , but by the same token, if you have no preconditions and
are in shape, deco is no big deal.

 Intermediate stops need to be done with an eye to the window
effectiveness and the gradient. If you do longer steps at the higher
ppo2's and shorten the lower ppo2's but move rapidly through the
gradient, you end up with a more effective deco overall , it is faster,
and the sooner you get closer to the finish line, the better you can
handle a big problem , and the lower the risk of the dive at the end of
the day, and that is what it is about . Identification of the risk is
tough for many of us because we got taught such slathering stupidity out
of the training agencies, but of course, now there is an alternative.

Rob Murray wrote:
> 
> George,
> I have noticed in your postings over the years that your intermediate stop
> times will max out, say doing 13 minutes for 3 consecutive stops for the
> cave dives. Is this also a function of the depth/time of the dive, like the
> deep stop times maxing out at 5 minutes for anything over 150 minutes BT?
> 
> Thanks,
> Rob
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quest-unsubscribe@gu*.co*
> For additional commands, e-mail: quest-help@gu*.co*

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]