On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Dave Sutton wrote: > >Dave - > > > >What do you use for buoyancy control when your drysuit springs a > >significant leak? > > First, the only failure of a drysuit that will cause an immediate and > catastrophic loss of all ability to hold air is a zipper failure. In 25+ > years of using drysuits I've not seen a total zipper separation I have, and in only 5 years of diving. And another case where a DUI TLS sprang enough of a leak in a boot to totally flood the suit in a few minutes. I don't doubt the reliability of drysuits in general. But it takes only one failure of this nature to convince me that betting my life on a drysuit is stupid. > I've never seen a drysuit flood to the point where it cannot be used for > some bouyancy control. A zipper separation, or failure to close the zipper completely, would certainly render the suit useless for buoyancy control rather quickly. > And, please remember, I use a Viking suit for the exact reason that it > -does not- change bouyancy with depth, thus I can weight myself > essentially neutral on the surface and any added air is merely for > warmth. You probably loose 6 or more pounds of ballast during a dive due to gas used. That means you've got 6 more liters of gas in the suit at the start of each dive than at the end. How do you manage that bubble? > but I'm not overweighted, and in fact can swim to the surface > with a completely flooded suit in all of my gear (and have gone to > the quarry and proven it by having a buddy unzip my suit for trials). You must be pretty heavy, and that swim would take a tremendous amount of effort! Not a good thing to do at the end of a long dive with a significant deco obligation IMO. > Now, for -last-ditch- stuff. You can always drop weight. For me that means > ditching my hammer and crowbar first and then maybe lead in a dire > emergency. Lastly, there is always that handy 50 pound liftbag attached to > my reel for setting up off-anchor deco. Either grip it and go (not best) or > simply set up an upline on the bag and climb the line. Since we are talking > -maybe- 6-8 (so maybe 10-15) pounds negative even under a zipper > failure state, this is easy. Post deco cut the bag free, drop weights and > swim the bat to the boat. Seems workable. But don't you think you're putting yourself at risk having to work that hard during the deco phase of a dive? > Remember, in many thousands of witnessed drysuit dives I have never > seen anything this catastrophic occur. Here's where we differ. I have seen a failure of this nature, and I call that significant evidence of the possibility. > Bottom line, I personally do not use a BC at all, unless diving -very- heavy > bottle rigs in which case I use a Dive Right wing on my backplate to carry > the bottles to neutral. In this case, of course, there is a BC too. Why don't you use the BC all the time? What advantage is there in *not* having it? -- Art Greenberg artg@ec*.ne* -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]