Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Kuiper, Greg" <GregKuiper@pa*.co*>
To: "'kirvine@sa*.ne*'" <kirvine@sa*.ne*>,
     "'techdiver@aquanaut.com'"
Subject: RE: Ralph Hood - Cannister Lights
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 10:01:52 -0700
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01BF090A.00804A16
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="windows-1252"

George Irvine,
My advice to people on the list comes from twenty one years of diving
experience.  You are incorrect in stating that my advice is worthless.  If
you don't like my opinion on light choices that is your perogative.  As far
as my being a smart ass I could never hold a candle to you in that regards.
Last time I checked this was the techdiver list not the caver list.  I only
have sixteen cave dives with maximum penetration being 2,700 ft.  My
opinions are based as I said before on twenty one years of ocean, wreck,
lake and minimal cave experience.  By the way I am flattered that you would
take the time to investigate my experience level.
Greg Kuiper

-----Original Message-----
From: kirvine@sa*.ne* [mailto:kirvine@sa*.ne*]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 9:22 AM
To: Kuiper, Greg
Cc: 'techdiver@aquanaut.com'
Subject: Re: Ralph Hood - Cannister Lights


Greg, now you are being a smart ass and I do not like that.

The fact is you have no more cave dives than what it took you to
complete a "resort course" in Mexico, and we both know that to be true,
yet you have no reservations about getting on here and passing out
worthless "advice".

Another fact of life is that I have many cave lights, some by Lamar
English, some by Bill Gavin, some by Arnold, Alex Varouxis, Barry
Miller, and some that I made myself. Along with that fact of life goes
the fact of life that I can make , buy or build anything I want, and do
so from the vantage point of extreme use. 

In all cases, the lights have certain things in common that are
necessary but are missing from the hood light.

1) the canister is recessed at the bottom or otherwise made by another
trick which we will not mention

2) in the case of the Barry lights, the canister is unbreakable

3) the length of the canister is such that the battery fits exctly when
compressed 

4) the light is negative by the correct amount

5) there is no slop in the battery

6) there are no switches hanging down or other baloney in the lid to
break

7) there are no circuits or fuses in the light canister to fail ( the
hid versions have a circuit in the head, but we carry replacement slugs
with those)

8) there are no crappy connectors in the light

9) the cord runs through the lid with a proper compression fitting, and
not some plastic insanity ( like the hood) or other insecure arrangement
that would allow the cord to slide and hence leak

10) the other end of the cord is equally secure

11) the slug fits exactly to the head

12) the head has exactly the correct reflector ( which is replaceable)
for the perfect focus

13) the batteries plug in with no moving wires by putting the lid on in
the correct oreintation

14) the pivot point is selectable for the belt loop  

15) the o-rings are surface blowouts only , no embedded stupidity

16) there are other wiring issues in the head, but we will skip that for
now

17) the overall lngth of even the nicad version of my lights is shorter
than anything made elasewhere for the same power, and hence fits more
easily along the side of the diver with no discomfort or clustery

18) only a braindead stroke would buy some has-been verion of nothing
made by noboyd  when the real thing is available from the pros.

19) you are a known rookie at this, and your attraction to this light
alone makes it suspect.

20) I have more, but I will let somebodly else finish this one off for
real.

Kuiper, Greg wrote:
> 
> George Irvine,
> By all means tell me why you think the Ralph Hood light is a pathetic
> compromise for the real thing.  Also are saying that if it isn't made
> by Barry Miller then it is not sufficient?  If this is not the case
> then what other light brands do you recommend.
> 
> Greg Kuiper
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kirvine@sa*.ne* [mailto:kirvine@sa*.ne*]
> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 1999 9:28 AM
> To: Kuiper, Greg
> Cc: 'Elly & Matt'; techdiver@aquanaut.com
> Subject: Re: Ralph Hood - Cannister Lights
> 
> Greg, like your Pelican backup light ( an oxymoron in this case) , the
> 
> Hood light is a pathetic compromise for the real thing.
> 
> Do you want to know why, or do you just want to stay in the dark.
> 
> Let me know .


------_=_NextPart_001_01BF090A.00804A16
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dwindows-1252">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2448.0">
<TITLE>RE: Ralph Hood - Cannister Lights</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>George Irvine,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>My advice to people on the list comes from twenty =
one years of diving experience.  You are incorrect in stating that =
my advice is worthless.  If you don't like my opinion on light =
choices that is your perogative.  As far as my being a smart ass I =
could never hold a candle to you in that regards.  Last time I =
checked this was the techdiver list not the caver list.  I only =
have sixteen cave dives with maximum penetration being 2,700 ft.  =
My opinions are based as I said before on twenty one years of ocean, =
wreck, lake and minimal cave experience.  By the way I am =
flattered that you would take the time to investigate my experience =
level.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Greg Kuiper</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>From: kirvine@sa*.ne* [<A =
HREF=3D"mailto:kirvine@sa*.ne*">mailto:kirvine@safari.net</A>]</FONT>=

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 9:22 AM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To: Kuiper, Greg</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Cc: 'techdiver@aquanaut.com'</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Subject: Re: Ralph Hood - Cannister Lights</FONT>
</P>
<BR>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Greg, now you are being a smart ass and I do not like =
that.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>The fact is you have no more cave dives than what it =
took you to</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>complete a "resort course" in Mexico, and =
we both know that to be true,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>yet you have no reservations about getting on here =
and passing out</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>worthless "advice".</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Another fact of life is that I have many cave lights, =
some by Lamar</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>English, some by Bill Gavin, some by Arnold, Alex =
Varouxis, Barry</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Miller, and some that I made myself. Along with that =
fact of life goes</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>the fact of life that I can make , buy or build =
anything I want, and do</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>so from the vantage point of extreme use. </FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>In all cases, the lights have certain things in =
common that are</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>necessary but are missing from the hood =
light.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>1) the canister is recessed at the bottom or =
otherwise made by another</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>trick which we will not mention</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>2) in the case of the Barry lights, the canister is =
unbreakable</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>3) the length of the canister is such that the =
battery fits exctly when</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>compressed </FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>4) the light is negative by the correct amount</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>5) there is no slop in the battery</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>6) there are no switches hanging down or other =
baloney in the lid to</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>break</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>7) there are no circuits or fuses in the light =
canister to fail ( the</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>hid versions have a circuit in the head, but we =
carry replacement slugs</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>with those)</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>8) there are no crappy connectors in the light</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>9) the cord runs through the lid with a proper =
compression fitting, and</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>not some plastic insanity ( like the hood) or other =
insecure arrangement</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>that would allow the cord to slide and hence =
leak</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>10) the other end of the cord is equally
secure</FONT>=

</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>11) the slug fits exactly to the head</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>12) the head has exactly the correct reflector ( =
which is replaceable)</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>for the perfect focus</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>13) the batteries plug in with no moving wires by =
putting the lid on in</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>the correct oreintation</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>14) the pivot point is selectable for the belt =
loop  </FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>15) the o-rings are surface blowouts only , no =
embedded stupidity</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>16) there are other wiring issues in the head, but we =
will skip that for</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>now</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>17) the overall lngth of even the nicad version of my =
lights is shorter</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>than anything made elasewhere for the same power, =
and hence fits more</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>easily along the side of the diver with no =
discomfort or clustery</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>18) only a braindead stroke would buy some has-been =
verion of nothing</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>made by noboyd  when the real thing is =
available from the pros.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>19) you are a known rookie at this, and your =
attraction to this light</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>alone makes it suspect.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>20) I have more, but I will let somebodly else finish =
this one off for</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>real.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Kuiper, Greg wrote:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> George Irvine,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> By all means tell me why you think the Ralph =
Hood light is a pathetic</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> compromise for the real thing.  Also are =
saying that if it isn't made</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> by Barry Miller then it is not =
sufficient?  If this is not the case</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> then what other light brands do you =
recommend.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Greg Kuiper</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> -----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> From: kirvine@sa*.ne* [<A =
HREF=3D"mailto:kirvine@sa*.ne*">mailto:kirvine@safari.net</A>]</FONT>=

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 1999 9:28 =
AM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> To: Kuiper, Greg</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Cc: 'Elly & Matt'; =
techdiver@aquanaut.com</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Subject: Re: Ralph Hood - Cannister =
Lights</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Greg, like your Pelican backup light ( an =
oxymoron in this case) , the</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Hood light is a pathetic compromise for the =
real thing.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Do you want to know why, or do you just want to =
stay in the dark.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Let me know .</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01BF090A.00804A16--
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]