Den 05:19 02-09-99 skrev Kevin Connell: >Don't get me wrong, I like the program, but just entering waypoints is a >much better system. Both decom and zplan make it really easy. > >Depth, Time, Mix. viola I see your point which is valid. >Actually GAP has a lot of UI bugs from what I can tell, anyway. Oooups! I hope you have forwarded those to mailto:decosw@th*.co* ? >Also, as I suggested to the author, it would be a lot more usefull if you >could adjust the G.F.'s at each point in the dive. GF's (I think) are >typically manipulated during the dive, maybe say .7 high for the nitrox >deco, and then approaching 1.0 high for the shallow. Baker's algoritm prescribes two 'setpoints' GF Lo and GF Hi and then draws a line between these two points. I don't know if you have read the Baker article (comes with the installation) but to me (and I am not speaking for the author!) I wonder if GFs for every waypoint really is necessary. What you suggest can be done (fairly) accurately by adjusting the GF Lo and GF Hi values. Or? ://Peter Fjelsten -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]