At 09:35 PM 20/8/99 +1000, Guy Wittig wrote: >I might just like to point out that it is fine to pontificate about deep air >from the land of plenty where helium flows from the earth, but in many >places helium is seriously expensive and only used when necessary. > >E.G. to fill my doubles with 40% costs $130 - plus deco gas - plus boat >fees. That is one expensive morning's outing. Guy, if you can't afford the ponies, why play polo? Phone Linde - $240 gets a G of high purity He delivered. It doesn't cost much to knock any mix down to a low narcotic level. >Around here even the most devout DIR divers are unlikely to use helium under >50m. See above. >So as far as I can see the agency 57m or 1.4pp02 limit is not >unreasonable from a global perspective. >If we could get people to keep deep air to 57m as the agencies recommend, >then most of the stupidity would be eliminated. No. All of the stupidity would be retained, because no-one is reliable, no-one is safe at 57 metres on air. >I know there are those of you who will say do it right or don't do it at >all - but that is ok for you. You don't have to make the choice. No-one's forcing you to dive deep. The choice you should make is not to do it 'till you can afford to do it safely. Do shallower dives - ones within your budget. Or get a better paying job or a second income. But don't fuck the sport over with deep air bullshit because you want to play without paying. rgds billyw -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]