Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <bdi@wh*.ne*>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:09:47
To: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: DEEP AIR VOTE
At 09:35 PM 20/8/99 +1000, Guy Wittig wrote:

>I might just like to point out that it is fine to pontificate about deep air
>from the land of plenty where helium flows from the earth, but in many
>places helium is seriously expensive and only used when necessary.
>
>E.G. to fill my doubles with 40% costs $130 - plus deco gas - plus boat
>fees. That is one expensive morning's outing.

Guy, if you can't afford the ponies, why play polo?

Phone Linde - $240 gets a G of high purity He 
delivered. It doesn't cost much to knock any mix 
down to a low narcotic level.

>Around here even the most devout DIR divers are unlikely to use helium under
>50m. 

See above.

>So as far as I can see the agency 57m or 1.4pp02 limit is not
>unreasonable from a global perspective.
>If we could get people to keep deep air to 57m as the agencies recommend,
>then most of the stupidity would be eliminated.

No. All of the stupidity would be retained, 
because no-one is reliable, no-one is safe 
at 57 metres on air.

>I know there are those of you who will say do it right or don't do it at
>all - but that is ok for you. You don't have to make the choice.

No-one's forcing you to dive deep. The choice you 
should make is not to do it 'till you can afford 
to do it safely. Do shallower dives - ones within 
your budget. Or get a better paying job or a second 
income. But don't fuck the sport over with deep air 
bullshit because you want to play without paying.

rgds     billyw
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]