Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: "techdiver.msg" <techdiver@opal.com>
Subject: RE: RE:RE: IWR and O2
From: "Robertson, Iain" <ROBERTSONI@ol*.ag*.bt*.co*.uk*>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 94 09:05:00 GMT
I know.
I meant (but probably didn't say) that all kit should be in O2 service. 
Standard just referred o the cylinder plus the usual DV regulator, rather 
than a specialised O2 delivery system.

                         Iain
 ----------
* From: owner-techdiver
* To: techdiver.msg
* Subject: RE:RE: IWR and O2
* Date: Friday 9 December 1994 11:33
*
* iain robertson writes:
*
* >1. Most standard O2 kits have an oro-nasal mask -  I wouldn't trust it to 
be
* >watertight. If you're using a big (eg 10 or 12l) scuba cylinder with a
* >demand valve, then it might work. (As an aside, any thoughts anyone on 
the
* >pros/cons of using standard scuba kit to administer O2, rather than use a 

* >'standard' O2 kit?)
*
*
*
* You cannot use 100% O2 with standard scuba equipment. O2 in contact with
* petroleum based products can cause an explosion or fire. Standard suba 
makes
* extensive use of petroleum washers, screws, etc in the manufacture of the
* first and second stages. The demand valve for an O2 kit is made 
specifically
* for O2 delivery.
*
*
*                                 Mike Pallone
*                                 Nashua, NH
*                                 pallone@zk*.de*.co*
*
* --
* Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@opal.com'.
* Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@opal.com'.
* 

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]