Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Mike Langborg" <mslangborg@cl*.ne*>
To: "Techdiver mailing list" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Halcyon rebreather
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 17:56:18 +0200
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_000C_01BEA933.630F83E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On a resent diver trip down south (Waymouth) we met some DIR divers. =
Some dived the Halcyon Rebreather (open water).
=20
It was rigged with two 7 litres (45 Cft.) on the sides of the unit. We =
asked if they did not use stages for DECO, and the answer was : NO
=20
They dived to about 30 meter (100 ft) so I can se why they might opt to =
leave stages, but when we asked if they used stages on the deeper dives =
the answer was still : NO.
=20
My question is therefor. Is this standard DIR(WKPP) procedures. If so =
why? Since this unit is NOT constant PPO2 you must have a longer =
hangtime compared to OC (and what about OC bailout?).
=20
Secondly why are the bottom mix carried on the back (on the sides of the =
unit) when a single stage would do the same, and easily can be carried =
along the deco stages?
=20
It doesn't make sense to me, so please enlighten me.
=20

Mike
=20
=20

------=_NextPart_000_000C_01BEA933.630F83E0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 =
HTML//EN">
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>On a resent diver trip down south =
(Waymouth) we=20
met some DIR divers. Some dived the Halcyon Rebreather (open=20
water).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>It was rigged with two 7 litres (45 =
Cft.) on the=20
sides of the unit. We asked if they did not use stages for DECO, and the =
answer=20
was : NO</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>They dived to about 30 meter (100 =
ft) so I can=20
se why they might opt to leave stages, but when we asked if they used =
stages on=20
the deeper dives the answer was still : NO.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>My question is therefor. Is this =
standard=20
DIR(WKPP) procedures. If so why? Since this unit is NOT constant PPO2 =
you must=20
have a longer hangtime compared to OC (and what about OC =
bailout?).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Secondly why are the bottom mix =
carried on the=20
back (on the sides of the unit) when a single stage would do the same, =
and=20
easily can be carried along the deco stages?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>It doesn't make sense to me, so =
please enlighten=20
me.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Mike</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000
size=3D2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_000C_01BEA933.630F83E0--

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]