At 07:14 PM 21/5/99 +0300, Club Red wrote: >Yes Kevin. > >Heresy. Religion. Fanaticism. Intolerance. > >These are the words which come to my mind. > >Regards. > >Hugo. Hugo, old chook, over a number of emails, I have taken each of your misapprehensions about the DIR system and carefully and politely corrected them. When you came up with a succession of spurious reasons why DIR would not work in your particular kind of water, point- by-point, I patiently showed you how each obstacle could be surmounted, until you finally ran out of lame excuses for not Doing It Right. ( I especially liked your claim that singles are easier to fill than a set of doubles). When you twisted my explanations, I carefully and civilly untwisted them. I have been nothing but polite and tolerant, even when, through ignorance or intention, your posts became rude and provocative. But now I have to ask a question Hugo. You obviously object quite strenuously when we propose a demonstrably safer and more efficient system of diving than the deep air strokery you teach and defend. So come on Hugo. Here's your big moment. What's your alternative? What exactly is it that YOU have to offer, besides a history of teaching young divers to dive deep on air? Of taking their money and justifying yourself with rambling half-coherent explanations of how "they were going to do it anyway." I'm curious to see if you have anything to offer besides the bullshit, braggadocio and two-faced hypocrisy that we have seen so far. rgds billyw > >-----Original Message----- >From: Scaleworks@ao*.co* <Scaleworks@ao*.co*> >To: bdi@wh*.ne* <bdi@wh*.ne*>; techdiver@aquanaut.com ><techdiver@aquanaut.com> >Date: Friday, May 21, 1999 5:49 PM >Subject: Re: > > >>In a message dated 99-05-21 10:14:28 EDT, bdi@wh*.ne* writes: >> >><< >"My understanding is that the DIR method includes the >> >reduction of clutter and the minimizing of potential >> >failure points. Can you really consider a backup BT as >> >clutter, or an additional failure point? How are people >> >configuring this backup timer on their gear where it is >> >considered clutter? I choose not to wear my BT on my >> >wrist, but on a console, clipped on the left d ring as >> >in DIR. Is this extra 4 inches of console clutter? " >> >> This person is now claiming that diving with a goddamn >> console is DIR!!!! >> >> >>Read it again Billy, I was asking what is wrong with a console, I merely >>stated I clip it off in the same fashion as DIR. Why don't you answer the >>question instead of getting your feathers all ruffled about imagined DIR >>heresy. >> >>Kevin >>-- >>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. >>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. >> > >-- >Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. >Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. > > -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]