Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <bdi@wh*.ne*>
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 08:50:32 +1000
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: Hugo's contribution
At 07:14 PM 21/5/99 +0300, Club Red wrote:
>Yes Kevin.
>
>Heresy. Religion. Fanaticism. Intolerance.
>
>These are the words which come to my mind.
>
>Regards.
>
>Hugo.

Hugo, old chook, over a number of emails, I have taken each 
of your misapprehensions about the DIR system and carefully 
and politely corrected them.

When you came up with a succession of spurious reasons why 
DIR would not work in your particular kind of water, point-
by-point, I patiently showed you how each obstacle could be
surmounted, until you finally ran out of lame excuses for 
not Doing It Right. ( I especially liked your claim that 
singles are easier to fill than a set of doubles).

When you twisted my explanations, I carefully and civilly
untwisted them. I have been nothing but polite and tolerant, 
even when, through ignorance or intention, your posts became 
rude and provocative.

But now I have to ask a question Hugo. You obviously object 
quite strenuously when we propose a demonstrably safer and 
more efficient system of diving than the deep air strokery 
you teach and defend. So come on Hugo. Here's your big 
moment. What's your alternative? What exactly is it that YOU 
have to offer, besides a history of teaching young divers to 
dive deep on air? Of taking their money and justifying 
yourself with rambling half-coherent explanations of how 
"they were going to do it anyway."
 
I'm curious to see if you have anything to offer besides the
bullshit, braggadocio and two-faced hypocrisy that we have 
seen so far.

rgds   billyw


>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Scaleworks@ao*.co* <Scaleworks@ao*.co*>
>To: bdi@wh*.ne* <bdi@wh*.ne*>; techdiver@aquanaut.com
><techdiver@aquanaut.com>
>Date: Friday, May 21, 1999 5:49 PM
>Subject: Re:
>
>
>>In a message dated 99-05-21 10:14:28 EDT, bdi@wh*.ne* writes:
>>
>><< >"My understanding is that the DIR method includes the
>> >reduction of clutter and the minimizing of potential
>> >failure points. Can you really consider a backup BT as
>> >clutter, or an additional failure point? How are people
>> >configuring this backup timer on their gear where it is
>> >considered clutter? I choose not to wear my BT on my
>> >wrist, but on a console, clipped on the left d ring as
>> >in DIR. Is this extra 4 inches of console clutter? "
>>
>> This person is now claiming that diving with a goddamn
>> console is DIR!!!!  >>
>>
>>Read it again Billy, I was asking what is wrong with a console, I merely
>>stated I clip it off in the same fashion as DIR. Why don't you answer the
>>question instead of getting your feathers all ruffled about imagined DIR
>>heresy.
>>
>>Kevin
>>--
>>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>>
>
>--
>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>
>

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]