Author: ,"Robertson, Iain" <ROBERTSONI@ol*.ag*.bt*.co*.uk*> at SMTP Date: 09/12/94 06:56 >Tom, Possibly the treatment's better, but... >1. Most standard O2 kits have an oro-nasal mask - I wouldn't trust it to >be watertight. If you're using a big (eg 10 or 12l) scuba cylinder with a >demand valve, then it might work. (As an aside, any thoughts anyone on the >pros/cons of using standard scuba kit to administer O2, rather than use a >'standard' O2 kit?) Using standard scuba kit is fine as long as regs/cylinder are O2 cleaned/service. We intend using an 11 litre cylinder with dual regs on our boat, this will mean that we would be able to supply two divers on the surface for 50 minutes or one for 1.5 hours.(assumes 25L per min) The standard O2 kits tend too be to small in capacity. The oral nasal masks are fine, but are more suitable for unconscious casualties, and I would suggest not for in water use. >2. Possibility of an O2 fit, (O2 at 1.6 bar, + whatever exposure they've had >on the dive -a serious consideration if they've been on nitrox), with the >associated risk of drownng. a consideration, but this would need to be offset against helicopter arrival, etc >3. In the UK, hypothermia, divers drifiting away in the currents. IWR should not be considered unless adequate precautions are taken eg floating deco system which divers can attach themselves to, and boat can easily follow. any thoughts Andy Kerslake BSAC IANTD NSS Internet andy-kerslake@re*.co* X400 S=Kerslake G=Andy C=US ADMD=TELEMAIL PRMD=RETIX O=UK . --------- * From: owner-techdiver * To: techdiver * Subject: IWR and O2 * Date: Friday 9 December 1994 11:28 * * * Heres a interesting problem, ( to me anyway ). * * MOst dive boats in the UK, Private or otherwise carry a O2 kit for emergency * purposes. * * In the event of a missed stop or a suspected deco incident, we would put * said person on O2 on the boat. * * However would we be better giving the person the O2 kit and accompanying them * to 6m and telling them breath it there, Knowing that the treatment may be * 1.6 times better but only 1/1.6 times as long, if you follow my logic * ( probably flawed). * * Tom. * * ******************************************************************** * _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ tow@ua*.nb*.ac*.uk* * _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ PROUDMAN OCEANOGRAPHIC LABORATORY * _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ BIDSTON,MERSEYSIDE * _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ENGLAND. L43 7RA * * I have to go down to the sea again, to the call of the running tide * Tis a wild call but a clear call, that cannot be denied. * ******************************************************************** * * -- * Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@opal.com'. * Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@opal.com'. * -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@opal.com'. Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@opal.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]