Obviously you do not read all the post the MOD sticker does have 3 inch high letters on it. Respectfully yours, Tom Mount CEO IANTD World HQ http://www.iantd.com -----Original Message----- From: Nanci LeVake <nlevake@pi*.co*> To: Bill Mee <wwm@sa*.ne*>; Tom Mount <TOM.MOUNT@wo*.at*.ne*>; Ken Sallot <sallot@mi*.co*>; kirvine@sa*.ne* <kirvine@sa*.ne*> Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com <techdiver@aquanaut.com>; cavers@ca*.co* <cavers@ca*.co*> Date: Thursday, April 29, 1999 8:52 PM Subject: Re: A Dead Skunk: The growing stink of Bottle Marking >I think Tom is missing a huge business opportunity. What if IANTD _made_ >new IANTDish MOD stickers? They could be cool nitrox-y colors, oriented >horizontally with 3 inch numerals, but the important thing is that ALL >IANTD divers would be required to change their bottle marking stickers to >the new IANTD standard! Those who couldn't dedicate two or three >aluminum 80s as stage bottles would have to buy even more stickers so they >could cover up the old stickers. It would make thousands!!!!! It's so >simple. I don't know why someone didn't think of this sooner! I've solved >the problem of IANTD tank marking!!!!! > > > >At 04:52 PM 4/29/99 -0400, Bill Mee wrote: >>Tom, >> >>LIke a dead skunk in the road, the subject of bottle markings gets flatter >>and flatter, but the stink just won't go away. I have patiently read through >>your bottle marking standards. Colored Regulator Jackets and flaky little >>peel off MOD stickers just do not cut it. The argument has been made to you >>politely, impolitely, nastily, obnoxiously and just about every other way >>possible, yet the most obvious solution to the problem still is missing. It >>is inconcievable that you don't understand the rationale and logic behing >>the 3" MODs on either side of gas bottles. >> >>My question is the following: What gives? You must a have a very big problem >>with this method or otherwise you would have incorporated it into your >>standards a long time ago. There must be a good reason for not doing this. >>Maybe the reason is a private one and cannot be answered in public for >>reasons of liability or economics. Fine, then plead the fifth. Anyway, I >>think you owe everyone out here a reasonable explanation for what it is that >>you cannot accept about this method. >> >>I am not trying to be sarcastic and a wise guy here. I am just very curious >>as to what the extreme prejudicial reason is for your finding double sided >>3" MODs less acceptable than scotch tape and colored regulator jackets. >>This is a fair question and since you are already out here in the midst of a >>discussion on this public forum, in the capacity of director of the largest >>technical diving organization on earth, you are fair game. >> >>Best regards, >> >>Bill >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Tom Mount <TOM.MOUNT@wo*.at*.ne*> >>To: Ken Sallot <sallot@mi*.co*>; kirvine@sa*.ne* >><kirvine@sa*.ne*> >>Cc: bdi@wh*.ne* <bdi@wh*.ne*>; William J Turbeville II <bturbo@ga*.ne*>; >>techdiver@aquanaut.com <techdiver@aquanaut.com>; cavers@ca*.co* >><cavers@ca*.co*> >>Date: Thursday, April 29, 1999 9:22 AM >>Subject: Re: Fatality at Die Polder III >> >> >>>Ken >>>It is not just color coding however as any photography can tell you and you >>>can prove by looking there are colors such as green, yellow and pink that >>>are still visible at depth regardless of ROY G BIV. They are less brilliant >>>but still seeable but the point is not the color it is they state oxygen 0r >>>deco gas I or Nitrox is highly visible wording. so they are readable to all >>>and identify the gas type and in deco gas and Oxygen state mod on them, >>>Second the contents tape is readable to the diver, third the MOD is >>readable >>>to all, fourth the mountpeice wrap is completely noticeable as you cannot >>>breat around it. >>> >>>Please remove me from your CC list >>> >>>Respectfully yours, >>>Tom Mount >>>CEO IANTD World HQ >>>http://www.iantd.com >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Ken Sallot <sallot@mi*.co*> >>>To: kirvine@sa*.ne* <kirvine@sa*.ne*> >>>Cc: bdi@wh*.ne* <bdi@wh*.ne*>; Tom Mount <TOM.MOUNT@wo*.at*.ne*>; >>>William J Turbeville II <bturbo@ga*.ne*>; techdiver@aquanaut.com >>><techdiver@aquanaut.com>; cavers@ca*.co* <cavers@ca*.co*> >>>Date: Thursday, April 29, 1999 8:00 AM >>>Subject: Re: Fatality at Die Polder III >>> >>> >>>>Even your typical Openwater 1 student should be able to tell you that >>>>color coding things is stupid if for no other reason then ROYGBIV. Next >>>>we'll hear about how the students should sniff the gases to determin the >>>>proper amount of oxygen in the mix. >>>> >>>>kirvine@sa*.ne* wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Billy , this is what happened with Jane ORensten - not only did they >>>>> have no idea what was in the tanks by looking at them, they never even >>>>> noticed she was breathing the wrong one based on the side bullshit that >>>>> Mount subscribes to ( and actually REQUIRES instructors to do if you can >>>>> believe that ), and they did not notice that the colored regs , poodle >>>>> jackets and the rest of the claptrap was wrong. >>>> >>>>-- >>>>"What's terrible is to pretend that the second-rate >>>>is first-rate." >>>> -- Doris Lessing >>>> (British writer) >>>> >>>> >>> >>> > >*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* >http://www.pipeline.com/~nlevake/ -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]