George- Read your post...you imply that for a store Nitrox is MORE DANGEROUS than trimix. ("I can understand that someone doesnt want to do the more dangerous Nitrox fills, but with Trimix...") Your points about profitability are quite valid, but they serve nothing toward your earlier point that Nitrox is more dangerous...I believe that is what people were calling you to task on... -Case diveman@cy*.co* >I can understand that someone doesnt want to do the more dangerous Nitrox fills, but with >Trimix... >What's the dangerous part????? >Care to explain? Liability! Profitability! 1. If a business does not of significant demand for a product they will not produce it. If a shop has 2-3 Certified Trimix divers that frequent the establishment, it is not worthwhile to make the investment in supplies and training to properly service this minority. 2. Lets take a look at liability. A diver makes a dive on a 15/53 refill to 300 feet, he makes a mistake and doesn't come up. Later it's discovered, after laboratory analysis, that the mix was really 15/48. Narcosis may have been a contributing factor to his death. Can you see the possible law suit? While Oxygen % can be readily measured, equipment to measure Helium % is cost prohibitive and not readily available to the dive industry. If you say cost bedamned see paragraph 1. Good Diving by George -- \ \ ^_ \ \ Case E. Harris \ \ { \ US Deep Wreck Diving Team { \ / `~~~--__ diveman@cy*.co* { \___----~~' `~~-_ \ /// ` `~. ___ Oo / /~~~~-, ,__. , /// __,,,,) (___)o_o \/ \/ `~~~; ,---~~-_`~= //====--//(_) / / \\ ^ '._.' Deep...Professional...The Standard! -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]