Jim This email is a combination of DIR evangelism and a dive report for those interested in such things. Recall your email recently: >For the benefit of our sometimes doubtful audience, what effect did your >rather expensive changeover from strokedom to DIR have on your diving >experience? I usually confine my emails to big issues such as cable ties :-), but it occurred to me that I had another angle from which to answer to your question. Here is a personal account of a dive I did at the weekend. The big boys have done bigger dives, but for me the dive below was one of my most serious and fun dives to date. This weekend Greg Maud and myself pushed the end of the line at Badgat, South Africa. We are both DIR divers and perhaps it was this equipment and philosophy that helped. Mike Fowler had hoped to "slip away", whilst is partner Don Shirley was not watching, and join us on the dive. Unfortunately, over the weekend the South African Free Diving Championships were being held and so the IANTD Badgat Dive Centre was busy mixing gas for support divers. Badgat is a disused and flooded quarry with an extensive and deep cave system. Water temperatures are around 25 Deg C (77 Deg F) in the shallow deco stop depth. In the cave, it gets colder but I keep forgetting to check the temperature. Badgat is an altitude dive being 900m (2,970') above sea level. Outside the cave, there is a pit which is 54m (178') deep and a cave system in various levels: 9m (30'), 18m (60'), 24m (80'), 38m (125'), 48m (158'), 68m (224'), 108m (356') and beyond. The entrance to the cave is at 12m (40'). After spending the weekends of the last two months exploring the shallower levels with various dive partners, I wanted to check out the 108m (356') level. The dive went something like this: Descend to the cave opening at 12m (40'), drop to 18m (60') and follow the permanent line for 130m (429') to the vertical shaft. We allowed 11 minutes for this portion of the dive as there is a restriction to pass through. The swim through murky water at this level was slow but there was no rush. We were a few minutes ahead of schedule arriving at the shaft and hung around to let the clock catch up. We dropped our 50% deco bottle at the 24m (80') level and dropped down to 36 (119') metres and switched from 35% to our bottom gas 11/59. Our 35% stage was dropped here. Again, ahead of schedule we hung around for a minute, starting our descent 14 minutes into the dive. The plan was to reach the bottom of the shaft at 17 minutes but our descent was slower than expected and arrived two minutes late at 108 metres (356'), or so. Must improve this next time. Visibility in the shaft and deeper sections of the cave was around 40m, so it was a great sight to see the bottom loom out of the blackness and the permanent line beckoning to us to follow. As we approached the bottom we glided into swimming mode and started along the line. The passageways at this level are roughly 3 metres (10') wide and 2-3 ( 7-10') metres high. My primary light illuminated the walls clearly and the visibility was so good that just blackness loomed in the distance. We swam at a comfortable yet fast pace and after about 4 minutes reached the end of the line, 100 m (330') from the shaft. What an impressive sight! To the left of the main passageway was a large alcove with an opening the size of a garage door. This opening lead to a straight shaft descending at 45 degrees down and retaining the proportions of the opening. Indications are that this inclined shaft goes to 150m (495') plus. However, our plan was to see if the 108m (356') level ends with a rock slide, as is the case with the shallower levels, rather than to gratuitously gain depth. I tied on to the end of the existing line and continued along the passageway, adding a further 40m (132') to the line, making a total of 140m (462') from the shaft and 380m (1,254') to the surface. At the new end of the line, the passageway just went on and on, confirming that it does indeed extend under the pit above. At this point we hit thirds, so I tied off and we started the swim back, reaching the main shaft 29 minutes into the dive. I started deep stops at 70m (119') with a slow ascent between stops until I reached my first "mandatory" stop at 39m (129'). In total, I added 10 minutes of deep stops to the schedule. Away from the agoraphobic visibility of the lower levels, the swim through the training murk of the 18m (60') passageway was slow and relaxing and reminded me of good old Blighty. (People from the UK say things like this to propagate the myth that UK vis is poor, thus keeping the excellent wreck diving to themselves!) I combined both the 18m (60') and 15m (50') stops during this swim. We did our final deco on O2 hanging at the exit point, with back gas breaks which I included as deco. Total in water time was 151 minutes. Equipment-wise, I dived twin 12 litre cylinders of 11/59 and 10 litre stages with 35% and 50%, my oxygen was in a 7 litre, with a 12 litre safety available. Sadly, my WKPP scooter which would have been ideal for this dive is in the UK. My deco was without problems. Greg was running a more conservative profile and had to do unplanned additional time at 6 m due to a previous shoulder problem which resolved itself after his extended decompression. Contingency gas was available for this. My tables were produced with Abyss 2.02 (125 Algorithm, safety parameters set to zero). Deep stops were not planned in but executed (added) into the actual profile. 8 minutes of back gas breaks were counted as part of the deco whilst on O2. The "mandatory" deco stops suggested by the Abyss were followed and not shortened. Greg used DECOM for his dive planning and, as mentioned earlier, had a profile more conservative by 23 minutes. Thanks to Mike Fowler and George Leonard for mixing the gas at this busy time. Thanks also to Lo Vingerling for in-water support. Mike "if-only-I-could-get-the-Halcyon-though-the-green-door" Fowler, was a bit miffed at not being able to join us, as planned, but this was his most busy weekend of the year. We originally had planned to do the dive with a stage of bottom gas to increase our bottom time. However, I must confess that on the dive of the previous day I found that I had a leaky dry suit and could not guarantee it would not leak on the day of the "big" dive. I didn't fancy 3-4 hours being wet in water, so we adjusted our dive plan. Perhaps we would have got to the end of this level? I only hope I have an opportunity to find out! After the dive, I was fortunate enough to I met one of the divers who had placed the original line three years ago. I'm not sure what equipment they used but as I understand Heliair (50/50) was used on the dive. This has an END of 50m. The old line was placed over two dives. Hmmm. Now the nub of all of this, referring back to the DIR equipment configuration aspects, is that we adopted a DIR philosophy and added 40% more line in our first dive. This dive was fun. Although I was excited during the dive, I remained very relaxed as is illustrated by my RMV which was just over 13 litres/minute (0.47 CuFt) except for O2 which was considerably lower. Our equipment and configuration allowed us to enjoy the dive rather than worrying about extraneous matters or being numbed by narcosis. David Shimell Project Manager, Sequent Computer Systems Ltd., Sandton, South Africa. Email: shimell@se*.co* <mailto:shimell@se*.co*> -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]