Sean T. Stevenson wrote: > > >2. Isolator valve on manifold: Si or No ? > > The isolator is necessary. In overhead environments, the possibility > exists to break off the right post knob, and if after doing so you have > a first stage failure on this post, by closing the isolator you save > half your gas (and probably your life). > At the risk of being a peon in a holy war, Robert Wood adds: Are you seriously telling me that you will be crashing around in a wreck or cave with such force and carelessness that you are going to be breaking the tank valve/post/knob? If this is the case, then rather than add additional equipment, and thus failure points, why not either place a small shield by the valve knob (not a cage) or use a different design of valve/post/knob? How many incidents of broken valve/post/knob have there been? Are we not trying to solve a non-existant problem? [\] Robert Wood The St. Lawrence river - fresh, warm, visible diving. mailto:robert_wood@mi*.co* -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]