Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Bill Mee" <wwm@sa*.ne*>
To: "Paul Davis" <Paul.Davis@dr*.ne*>
Cc: <rebreather@nw*.co*>, "cavers" <cavers@ca*.co*>,
     , ,
     "\"Chris Werner\"" ,
     "\"John Rose\"" ,
     "\"Jess Armantrout\"" ,
     "\"Ken Sallot (latest)\"" ,
     "Brent\"" ,
     "\"Jeff Bentley \"" ,
     "\"mike bruic\"" ,
     "\"Jim Cobb\"" , "\"bdi \"" ,
     , "Errol Kalayci" ,
     "Jr.\"" , "\"RMC\""
Subject: Re: Natural Causes = What Next?
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 15:06:37 -0500
Paul,

You obviously or purposely failed to understand my point which is that in
cases of dive related deaths, particularly in hypoxia, the forensically
determined cause of death may in fact be indistinguishable from “natural
causes”.  In the case of the Henry Kendall death, he was using a Mk 5 Cis
Lunar with the port selector block in the off position, thus preventing him
from receiving oxygen. Chris Werner went to considerable lengths to politely
explain these facts to you in his reply. If when we see the download from
the device and it shows that he dropped to the floor of the sinkhole, which
is a minimum of seventy to eighty feet, then this would explain a lot. At
that depth the diluent is breathable for a while, but on ascent the
subsequent preciptious drop in ppo2 would induce hypoxia immediately.
Rebreathers are dangerous devices and as Richie Pyle and others have often
stated, Complacency Kills. When someone dies while using a rebreather it is
really foolish to try to argue that “natural causes” were responsible when
it is so well established that rebreathers are death waiting to happen for
the complacent or careless.  If in fact you are diving a rebreather and
spontaneously perish from “natural causes”, of which heart failure is the
only one that comes to mind (unlike say lung cancer), then you can make the
rather strong argument that using the device in the first place was a
serious “diver error” of judgement.

It is very amusing that you jumped right out into headlights upon my mention
of the Atlantis rebreather.  I almost fell out of my chair laughing simply
because almost everyone on this list knows that the Atlantis is a dangerous
piece of garbage.  Defending this device is similar to defending “bungee
wings” and square dive lights and other known defective designs. Since you
are so obsessed with getting the facts out why don’t you address the points
about the Atlantis that George made (points 1 – 4).  Also would you please
tell us which of these points caused the “natural” brain damage to the
British agent in Hawaii. This will be much more amusing than debating
“causes of death” and in fact will be about as entertaining as listening to
Clinton tell us that oral sex is not really sex.   While we can argue the
pros and cons of established rebreather designs, such as the Mk 15, Mk16,
the Prism, the Cis Lunar and even the newer technical designs such as the
Inspiration, there is no argument that the Atlantis is a criminally
dangerous toy.  In fact if the Atlantis was classified as a toy it would now
be illegal in this country.

Go ahead Paul and make our day. We would thoroughly enjoy exposing this
“cheeseball” and watching you dance like a possum skittering under an 18
wheeler, while you try to convince us that the Atlantis deserves to be
featured in the Smithsonian’s Hall of Technical Excellence. In fact the
Atlantis should be prominently featured in the RonCo Hall of Fame along with
the pocket fishermen and the vegomatic.

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Davis <Paul.Davis@dr*.ne*>
To: wwm@sa*.ne* <wwm@sa*.ne*>
Cc: rebreather@nw*.co* <rebreather@nw*.co*>
Date: Sunday, February 21, 1999 12:38 AM
Subject: Natural Causes = What Next?


>Bill,
>
>You know I should have just let it pass by, but at least unlike many of
>your group at least your tone was pleasant if not condescending so I
>thought why not?
>I do not want your apology, I am asking you once again for facts? Let's
>discuss them on the list, please list facts but be sure you are right
>first. I do not claim there
>weren't any incidents, but I do have facts, lets see how good your
>information is that you base these wild claims? I have researched every
>incident, I have the
>coronail enquiries on these and only one was listed as natural causes. So,
>if I honestly fail to know a lot of things, please enlighten me.
>
>
>But I ask once again, if you are so sure about about the Wakulla incident
>then I for one would be happy to listen to facts but if all you have is
>innuendo's then let's
>leave it there?
>
>By the way, please don't use the informed source line again
>Paul Davis
>
>
><Bill Mee wrote>
>Paul,
>
>I am very sorry for mentioning the Atlantis.  It is a perfect example of a
>fine semi-closed rebreather. No one has ever been injured or killed while
>using an Atlantis.
>
>Paul, you seem to "honestly" fail to know about a  lot of things including
>the Wakulla incident. Should in the unlikely event someone find you
>floating
>belly up with an Atlantis on your back I surely hope that the medical
>examiner concludes that it is from natural causes.
>
>Good luck Paul,
>
>Bill
>
>
>

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]