Thanks for the info. Specifically, the video showed a guy with a single tank and a sport diver's bc swimming to that big old dino-bone, "discovering" it. And said that they were somewhere between 200 and 300 ffw. I remember distinctly. That's how come I mentioned here that I think they were "simulating" for the benefit of the viewers. I in no way intended to detract from the expedition, or to be critical. But the phrase "I don't think so" came to mind immediately when I saw it. P.S. If you ever go back and want volunteers, please don't hesitate to drop me a line. >> >> I think I've seen that one. Isn't that the one where they "found" a big >> old dino-bone sitting on some clean limestone? I think they were >> "simulating" - there is no way they could do a depth like that with >> those tanks. Not to mention how questionable the wisdom of it. > > Scott I was one of the group of divers of the WKPP(Wakulla Karst >Plains Project) who explored the cave system your referring to. Some >of the setup dives preceding the exploration were in fact done with >single tanks and air. Any deep or over-head enviroments were done >with dual 104 cu.ft. tanks with tri-mix for bottom mix and >decompression on trimix, nitrox, and 02. All divers who dove with >tri-mix were doplered before and after every dive. > ------------------------------------------------------- Scot Anderson email: scot@bt*.co* web: http://www.btg.com/~scot/ "Is he back from that dive trip yet?"
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]