Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: techdiver@opal.com
Subject: Re: Independent vs manifolds
From: "Terry McCracken" <terrym@it*.ns*.co*.au*>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 1994 11:01:32 -0500
On Nov 23, 10:47am, <MGardens@ao*.co*> wrote:
> Subject: Independent vs manifolds
> Dr. Ali Lawrie asks for field experience of manifolds vs two independent
> cylinders.
>
> I dive in Lake Superior; water temps are just above freezing to about 50 F.
>  I, like Dr. Lawrie, could never reach a manifold isolator valve because of
a
> drysuit and thick underwear.  A valve block in front of the diver would
help,
> if one exists.

I don't personally dive with a manafold, but the people I know that do seem
to be able to reach the manafold without too much trouble. They also leave
the isolation manafold CLOSED, then at points throughout the dive they reach
back and crack the valve to equalise the tanks , close and keep going. This
means that if they have any failure on either system ie free flow, burst
disks, O rings etc they are already in the emergency "mode" ie isolated, that
way the max loss is one tank.

>
> Problem with 2 independent cylinders:  A friend of mine nearly died of the
> bends in Lake Superior some years back as a result of not opening the valve
> on his second cylinder.  A small but critical error!  He ran out of air at
> 140 during an ascent from a 190 for 20 exposure.  Lots of permenant damage
> resulted.  Buddy was below by 20 feet or so and didn't realize the problem
in
> time to reach him.

This is the very reason that I was tought never to breath down one tank and
then switch, you have not "managed" your second supply at all. I start with
one reg in my mouth, desend, switch to the other tank, now I am sure that
both tanks seem to be working. Then I continue to switch at the 1/3 points
throughout the dive, I always maintain enough gas in both tanks to complete
the dive including deco plus a reserve. I realy don't mean to flame your
friend, but he made more than a "small but critical" error. He also must not
have been checking his guages to allow the first tank to get down to an out
of air situation, he did not maintain a proper reserve in the first tank. I
know all this can be dificult at 190 and I haven't been that far yet (160fsw
so far), and won't untill all the skills needed to keep me safe are reflex
actions learned at relativily shallower depths.
	I actually prefere Independants, With a manafold I find it hard to
belive that a major failure in one system could be dealt with quickly enough
at depth and narced etc to save your air supply.

				Just my $0.02 AUD
					Terry

>
> Every equipment configuration has its problems, I guess.
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@opal.com'.
> Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@opal.com'.
>-- End of excerpt from <MGardens@ao*.co*>




-- 
Life`s ABYSS, then you dive

********************************************************************
 Terry McCracken		 GEC ALSTHOM Information Technology 
 Software Support Engineer       Ph:  61 2 415 0509 
 terrym@ns*.co*.au* 		 Fax: 61 2 417 8635 

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]