Jess I can do it with either hand and it is just a light touch (press) next to my heart so only takes seconds no more time that to check your gauge. i usually do it with my left hand (light hand) Does not take any special coordination or effort to do it. Respectfully yours, Tom Mount CEO IANTD World HQ http://www.iantd.com -----Original Message----- From: Jess Armantrout <armantrout@wo*.at*.ne*> To: Tom Mount <TOM.MOUNT@wo*.at*.ne*>; Bill Mee <wwm@sa*.ne*>; Rebreather mail list <rebreather@nw*.co*> Cc: cavers@ca*.co* <cavers@ca*.co*>; techdiver <techdiver@aquanaut.com>; "Dan Volker" <dlv@ga*.ne*>; LT Dituri <dive4wrk@pi*.co*>; "Richard Pyle" <deepreef@bi*.bi*.or*>; kirvine@sa*.ne* <kirvine@sa*.ne*> Date: Wednesday, October 07, 1998 11:05 AM Subject: Re: WKKP: Love, Hate, CCRs and the USDCT >Tom, >Which hand do you do the manual add with, your scooter hand or your light >hand? >Jess > >---------- >From: Tom Mount <TOM.MOUNT@wo*.at*.ne*> >To: Bill Mee <wwm@sa*.ne*>; Rebreather mail list ><rebreather@nw*.co*> >Cc: cavers@ca*.co*; "Jess Armantrout" <armantrout@wo*.at*.ne*>; >techdiver <techdiver@aquanaut.com>; "Dan Volker" <dlv@ga*.ne*>; LT Dituri ><dive4wrk@pi*.co*>; "Richard Pyle" <deepreef@bi*.bi*.or*>; >kirvine@sa*.ne* >Subject: Re: WKKP: Love, Hate, CCRs and the USDCT >Date: Wednesday, October 07, 1998 8:29 AM > >Hi Bill > > >This is the emergency you presented: following it would be my reaction to >this not really serious event. > > (per Bill) >Lets pose the following scenario: You are on your CIS 4000ft back in A >>tunnel in a section with 4ft viz. You are following your buddy on the >line >>while trying to maintain control of your scooter without inhaling the line >>or other adjacent lines. Suddenly you notice the o2 warning light start >>flashing in the heads up display and at the same time you notice that the >>oxygen solenoid is not longer firing. > >Bill, First before I flashed my buddy, I would manually inject oxygen as >what you described is a low oxygen situation. I would switch the unit into >manual operation and continue the dive , in this case I would not even >bother to do OC ,as at the time the HUD gives me awarning it simply tells >me I', 0.02 below my normal setpoint and in no danger of hypoxia, If I >checked the ROD and found I was nearing a hypoxic situation I would then go >OC for a couple of breaths while I injected oxygen back to the normal >setpoint ( by the way I would have adequate OC bailout if I did this dive, >just would not have needed it in this case). > >You flash your buddy ahead of you but >>he cant see your light flash because of the bad visibility. You pause to >>switch over to open circuit. This is now a serious emergency and you need >to >>get on to the backup system asap. Now, your buddy is gone and will not >know >>that you are in trouble until he gets to clear water which may not be for >>another 1000 ft. > >Bill, this situtation is so easy to solve that there would be no reason to >shutdown the DPV as it is solves on the fly > >Your buddy is towing the backup rebreather on the backup >>scooter and your open circuit will only last 3 5 minutes at best at >280ft. > >Bill; Even if we were seperated I do not need the backup rebreather >Bill when you present a scenario like this it clearly reflects that you do >not have a working knowledge of the MK 5. It will talke much more than this >to demand a permanent if any switch to OC. A lot of options are available >to >remain on CCR and then you can bailout to SCR. The OC would only need to be >used during a transistion from one mode to the other as a precaution and to >be sure you had the system stable. > >I agree with you and I think most of the participants on the W2 project do >that adequate OC bailout should be available. But you need to understand >there are numerous ways to survive on the MK 5 prior to OC bailout and that >the OC bailout is easy to access and allows time for thinking. I have not >todate encountered a situtation that required me to stay in OC bailout mode >including total loss of sensors, because I got in a hurry and failed to >lock >them into the sensor housing during one of my early dives on the unit. > > > >>You think about how foolish you were to have believed in Bill Stone and >how >>nice your life was. These are your last thoughts. >> > >But they would not be anyones last thoughts who has been trained on the MK >5, because it was not a serious problem > >Next scenario please > >Respectfully yours, >Tom Mount >CEO IANTD World HQ >http://www.iantd.com > >-----Original Message----- >From: Bill Mee <wwm@sa*.ne*> >To: Rebreather mail list <rebreather@nw*.co*> >Cc: cavers@ca*.co* <cavers@ca*.co*>; "Tom Mount" ><TOM.MOUNT@wo*.at*.ne*>; "Jess Armantrout" ><armantrout@wo*.at*.ne*>; techdiver <techdiver@aquanaut.com>; "Dan >Volker" <dlv@ga*.ne*>; LT Dituri <dive4wrk@pi*.co*>; "Richard Pyle" ><deepreef@bi*.bi*.or*>; kirvine@sa*.ne* <kirvine@sa*.ne*> >Date: Tuesday, October 06, 1998 11:03 PM >Subject: WKKP: Love, Hate, CCRs and the USDCT > > >> >> >>I have received private emails conveying a sense of frustration and >futility >>about the WKPP. Many individuals feel that they will never have an >>opportunity to dive in such places as Wakulla Springs and other sites >under >>the WKPPs aegis, because they are viewed as bad guys or feel they are >>hated either by the director or other members. It is this abject >hopeless >>frustration which has motivated many people to sign on with the USDCT or >>forever remain as vocal detractors lurking on the periphery of our >>organization.. >> >>Aside from a tiny handful of people, whose attitude and retrograde mindset >>permanently prevents them from changing their ways, no one is excluded >from >>participation in the activities of the WKPP. It is well understood, >though >>perhaps not at first glance, that certain activities are inappropriate for >>some members. The WKPP got its start and made its initial mark in the >deep >>exploration of Leon Sinks and there is a potent understanding of the >extreme >>dangers and challenges of this form of diving. There is obviously a lot to >>be learned about mixed gas exploration diving. Especially prior to taking >>on major life or death challenge. The WKPPs program of gradually exposing >>members to all aspects of specialized diving, from surface management, gas >>mixing and deployment, dive setup, dive support, scooter diving, gas >diving >>and exploration diving is a time and result proven enterprise. We have a >>good track record and intend to keep it that way. >> >>It is exceptionally common in this sport to encounter those who are >trying >>to prove something either to themselves or their peer group. The trying >to >>prove something problem is at the core of much of the human carnage in >>technical diving, if you havent already noticed. Within the WKPP >>organization there are many checks and balances and hurdles in place to >>prevent people from hastening their demise. Anybody who is serious about >>pursuing mixed gas exploration cave diving should want to embrace this >>ideology and not perceive it as a type of punishment for political >>divergence. >> >>In short, anybody who really wants to dive and is committed to doing what >it >>takes will get a shot with the one caveat Eventually. >> >>Jess Armantrout has articulately described the arduous path to diving in >>extreme situations, such as Wakulla Springs. In keeping with the core >WKPP >>philosophy of the team is my life support Jess has disclosed the most >>basic of all requirements. That is the requisite of having two other >members >>who will dive with you as a team before you go anywhere, after all of the >>other hurdles have been attained. The USDCT should think long and hard >>about this. >> >>Our problem with the USDCT is not with the rank and file of people with >>legitimate aspirations and a desire to share in the opportunity to explore >>spectacular natural wonders. It is with the mistaken believe that there >is >>a magic shortcut to this activity. We perceive this situation not unlike >the >>perpetration of a fraud on the innocent and ignorant. Bill Stone, as >project >>leader presides over this situation and will be the one to accept >>responsibility when someone is killed or injured. You would think that >the >>experience of carrying a dead friend out Huatla would have tempered his >>enthusiasm for frivolous risk and made him much more careful in is >planning >>and preparation. >> >>When we listen to his ignorant and nonsensical remarks, which find their >way >>into the public domain (he will not debate us publicly) we are shocked at >>the blatant stupidity of certain of these hare brained schemes. Using the >>Cis Lunar Mk 5 without adequate open circuit bailout is a fine example of >>this dyslexic reasoning. While we have made our opinion well known >regarding >>the use of electronic CCRs in an overhead environment (very risky, but >>sometimes all 18 wheels will miss the smiling possum) we certainly would >>give Stone and King their due with a green light. That is if they take >the >>minimum precautions of a basic open circuit escape mechanism, at least for >>the others in the project, if not themselves. >> >> >>When you consider the above and you weigh the measured careful approach of >>the WKPP I hope you can understand why we do the things we do and take the >>inflexible attitude that we do. The issue here is not hatred of others, >but >>an overriding concern for the safety and well being of other humans in >what >>otherwise is a very serious and dangerous enterprise. Please view it in >>that regard and do not take umbrage of offense. >> >>Best wishes, >> >>Bill Mee >> >> >> > >-- >Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. >Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. >---------- > -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]