Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 04:10:33 -0400
From: Wrolf Courtney <wrolf@co*.ne*>
To: KybrSose@ao*.co*
CC: NAUI7874@ao*.co*, DOBSONJW@ao*.co*, techdiver@aquanaut.com, dlv@ga*.ne*
Subject: Re: Fitness envy and more Wrolfing stupidity
KybrSose@ao*.co* wrote:
> 
> Wrolf,
> 
>   I know you do tend not to hear the statements of George Irvine, due to a
> problem you have with his method of speaking, but he did state in a prior post
> to this list that he was unable to get Jane's wing to inflate due to the
> tension of the bungies causing the overpressure valve to fire and that this
> was witnessed both by Mr. Volker and Mr. Carmichael during the recovery, and
> that statements to this effect were given to the authorities.
> 
>   I doubt these three men would perjure themselves over the technical buoyancy
> compansator market.

Thank you for reminding me of this.  Except for reminding me of his
method of speaking.

I have every reason to believe the veracity and honesty of two of these
men.

So the "bondage" wings were unable to lift Jane off the bottom, several
days after
she was lost.

She was presumably very negative on the hang (a bad thing), using a lot
of lift from the BC to acheive neutral buoyancy.

With her wet suit, she would clearly have been more negative on the
bottom during her dive.  Presumably she managed to achieve at least near
neutral buoyancy, as she was able to leave the bottom with no reported
problem.

Now, in ascending from thirty to twenty feet, she would have needed to
dump some air.

But at twenty feet, she suddenly lost her neutral buoyancy, going
negative,and heading down.

So what happened at twenty feet?  Did she dump some air, but the dump
valve stuck open?  Did she fail to dump enough soon enough, and have the
overpressure go off and get stuck?  What makes her all of a sudden
uncorrectably negative at twenty feet, when she was doing fine at thirty
and below, with more need for lift.

If she was uncontrollably negative at twenty feet, then it does seem
reasonable that she could not be made neutral at depth, where wet suit
compression and (possible) lungs filling would have added to the lift
requirements of the BC further.

-- 
Wrolf

Wrolf's Wreck: http://www.concentric.net/~Wrolf

P.S.  At the request of Ken Sallot <kens@ac*.ne*>, I am
"keep[ing] this shit off of Cavers."

"If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and the
fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy
to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."
  -- U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, 1927

"Thank you for your support"  -- 1980s Bartles and James advertising
slogan.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]