Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 15:49:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: "William M. Smithers" <will@tr*.co*>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Death was a Bigot
To: RLatulip@ao*.co*
Cc: heseltine@ea*.ne*, kirvine@sa*.ne*, cavers@ca*.co*,
     techdiver@aquanaut.com, rebreather@nw*.co*,
     heyydude@pi*.co*

On Mon, 3 Aug 1998 RLatulip@ao*.co* wrote:

> In a message dated 8/3/98, 1:10:03 PM, will@tr*.co* writes:
> 
> <<<<Of course we do.  That's what the electronics are there for.
> 
> That's why the concept of redundancy is used in electronic rebreathers.
> And again, even if all the electronics fail, you can then
> fly it in a very efficient semi-closed mode. >>>>
> 
> This is like trying to explain the problems of smoking to a smoker!  Sooner or
> later it will bite them in the @$$. They just rather believe that it will
> never happen to them.  

That's not what I said.  Electronics are *expected* to eventually
fail, and there are time-proven ways for dealing with this, right
down to reliable methods for flying an electronic rebreather
without ANY electronics.  The redundancy is there in case
the primary systems fail.  Parts of ALL rebreather are
anticipated to fail.  The Halcyon 
has TWO "depth sensors".  But unlike the Halcyon, CCR redundant
systems don't step on each other.  Tell me, what happens 
when one of the "depth sensors" sticks at depth, and the vent ratio 
remains the same as you ascend?  Will the other one help any?  
How would you know this had happened?

On an electronic rebreather, if something goes wrong, you will know, 
because your PO2 will be affected, and there are a whole host of ways to
correct the situation.  Just about the only thing that
is unrecoverable on most CCR's is a total loop flood,
but that's the same on a Halcyon, and almost all other
rebreathers, with the exception of the Cis Lunar, which
even deals gracefully with TLF's.

> At the point of trying to keep the CCR units under a
> certain cost then a certain amount of compromise has to be given. I don't mind
> if you state that you dive a rebreather that uses electronics to monitor your
> gas, I do however mind when you attempt to tell me that it is perfect and
> electronics never fail.  

Again, I never said that - hell, I've had several electronics
failures.  But since they are easy to detect and easy to
compensate for, it's not a big deal.   One of the big 
misconceptions about rebreathers is that you don't have
much time to react when something like an electronics 
failure happens, when in fact, you usually have minutes
or tens of minutes.  Remember: when you take all the
electronics off a CCR, you are left with a semi-closed system.

> Hell youv'e been told over and over that the potential exist for electronic
> failure and I don't believe every failure will result in a successful bailout
> as has been proven in the past few weeks.

Let's not confuse the issue here - those guys all had
very little experience on their units, and probably
weren't taught any advanced bailout procedures.  For
that matter, they obviously hadn't even mastered
basic PO2 monitoring techniques, which mystifies me,
as it basically goes "Glance at your PO2 monitor
every 7-10 minutes at depth, and every couple
of minutes when shallow".  

Now let's say they forgot to turn the electronics on
before jumping in, as happened to a couple of
Buddy Aspiration users.  If they had developed the proper
reflexes, they would have noticed this within
one minute, gone to SC or OC bailout, and 
upon reaching the surface, would have probably 
slapped themselves on the forehead, turned on
the electronics, and gone diving.  Instead,
we have deaths, and near-deaths.  Don't
blame the car because your 16-year-old 
smashed into a tree the 8th time he
took the car out by himself.  And don't blame the
kid.  Question his driving instructor.

-Will


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]