Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 15:19:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: "William M. Smithers" <will@tr*.co*>
Subject: Re: Helium Deco / Wil
To: Kevin Connell <kevin@nw*.co*>
Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com

On Fri, 24 Jul 1998, Kevin Connell wrote:

> Will - I really know nothing about rebreathers  but isn't open circuit
> oxygen quicker offgassing? 
> 
> Ie/ isn't the rebreather going to start giving you the inerts back through
> the loop that is coming out of your lungs in the first place, causing the
> p. pressure gradient to drop?

You'd think so, but the actual amount of gas that you off-gass
is apparently miniscule, and doesn't affect the PO2 enough to 
even register.  I always had this image that off-gassing
involved a couple liters of gas or something, but apparently
it's *way* less than that.   What *is* important is making
sure you fully purge the loop several times when switching
to pure O2.

Regards,

-Will


 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> At 10:43 AM 7/24/98 -0400, "William M. Smithers" <will@tr*.co*> wrote:
> 
> >You would probably burn through about 25 cu. ft of
> >O2 in the process, if you include a 7-8 hour deco.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >-Will
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >> ----------
> >> > From: William M. Smithers <will@tr*.co*>
> >> > To: CHKBOONE@ao*.co*; techdiver@aquanaut.com
> >> > Subject: Re: Helium Deco / Wil
> >> > Date: Thursday, July 23, 1998 9:14 PM
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > On Thu, 23 Jul 1998, William M. Smithers wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > > Incidentally, that's also why Heliox is a much safer gas
> >> > > for repetetive multi-day diving - it clear almost completely
> >> > > out of your system overnight, unlike N2, which takes
> >> > > 36 hours or so.
> >> > 
> >> > BTW, for this and several other good reasons, I've been 
> >> > diving with NO nitrogen anywhere in the bottom
> >> > and deco mixes for about seven months now - I dive
> >> > Heliox10 end-to-end, with pure O2 for deco starting
> >> > at 20ft.  And I feel *great* after the dives.  Unless
> >> > I'm cruising a reef at 80fsw on Nitrox with an AL80, it's the devil
> >> > gas for me.
> >> > 
> >> > The extra hang time is shorter than you'd think.
> >> > Compared to an appropriate trimix, you're typically looking 
> >> > at an extra 10 minutes or so for an hour-long deco.
> >> > 
> >> > Of course, diving heliox can start to get more than a bit
> >> > pricey, unless you're on a closed circuit rebreather. ;)
> >> > (I typically burn through all of four cubic feet of
> >> > heliox for a typical two or three hour dive to > 250fsw).
> >> > 
> >> > Regards,
> >> > 
> >> > -Will
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> >  
> >> > >  
> >> > > >     Regardless of the rates of diffusion of two different gasses such
> >> as He
> >> > > > and N2, given a fixed period of time for on-gassing and a symmetrical
> >> cycle
> >> > > > each gas should off-gas completely in the same period of time. 
> >> > > >     If at the same time you pore red marbles into a bucket at a rate
> >> of 50 per
> >> > > > second and blue marbles into the same bucket at a rate of 100 per
> >> second for
> >> > > > 10 seconds then pore them out at the same rates for 10 seconds the
> >> bucket
> >> > > > should be empty of both groups of marbles at the same moment. 
> >> > > >     If, however, they are each pored in at different rates that
> >> decrease
> >> > > > exponentially and then out at linear rates (or close on both counts)
> >> then
> >> > > > there can be a divergence of the points in time at which each is
> >> totally clear
> >> > > > of the bucket.
> >> > > >     This would be true of all tissues, not just the slow ones, and
> >> this is
> >> > > > what I suspect is happening but I am looking for confirmation and a
> >> more
> >> > > > thorough description of the process.     I am not sure that the
> >> exponential /
> >> > > > linear model is valid or uniformly applicable.  
> >> > > > 
> >> > > >     I can see possible merrit in your suggestion if helium diffuses
> >> to points
> >> > > > beyond the influence of the blood stream but this would seem to make
> >> the
> >> > > > process dangerously unpredictable.    I agree that the use of helium
> >> would
> >> > > > probably shift the controlling tissue to a slower one for a portion
> >> of the
> >> > > > dive.
> >> > > >    Actually you are making two dives and two decompressions when
> >> using trimix
> >> > > > and I suspect that the procedures we customarily use are not the most
> >> > > > effective way to manage them.    I suspect that we are making a
> >> descending
> >> > > > excursion on nitrogen at the first gas switch so that we can blow off
> >> helium
> >> > > > earlier in the deco schedule than may be necessary.
> >> > > >     Something like this may be behind George's insistance that 50/50
> >> is a
> >> > > > better deco mix than 36 - because it delays that descending excursion
> >> on
> >> > > > nitrogen rather than jumping the helium deco gun and paying for it
> >> throughout
> >> > > > the rest of the deco by having to dump the nitrogen you took on to do
> >> it.    
> >> > > >     I may be way off base but if I can get a few questions cleared up
> >> I might
> >> > > > be able to shorten and improve the effectiveness of my deco
> >> procedures.
> >> > > > This post is the first question.
> >> > > > 
> >> > > >     I appreciate your response, Wil, and I hope that the explanation
> >> turns out
> >> > > > to be as simple as you suggest but I fear that I am in for some big
> >> headaches
> >> > > > over the next few days, especially if I can get Bill Mee, Eric
> >> Maiken, or John
> >> > > > Crea to bite on this.
> >> > > > 
> >> > > >     Does the above seem reasonable or is my brain so fogged with
> >> thinking
> >> > > > about this stuff that I am missing something obvious ?
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > Chuck Boone
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to
> >> `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> >> > > > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to
> >> `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
> >> > > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > --
> >> > > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> >> > > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to
> >> `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
> >> > > 
> >> > --
> >> > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> >> > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
> >> --
> >> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> >> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
> >> 
> >--
> >Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> >Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
> Kevin Connell <kevin@nw*.co*>
> 
> Northwest Labor Systems
> http://www.nwls.com
> Lake Stevens, WA
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> 
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]