Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Subject: Flogging, whipping and beating a dead horse.
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 17:39:34 -0400
From: Jim Cobb <cobber@ci*.co*>
To: <zimmmt@au*.al*.co*>, <KybrSose@ao*.co*>
cc: "techdiver" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Mike I think with this post you have taken over first place as the most 
annoying person on Techdiver, and possibly the whole world. Let me guess, 
you're a trial lawyer.

Sorry, Jammer, but kings can only rule so long....

 Jim

Sender: Mike Zimmerman  Date: 7/22/98 3:53 PM

>>  <<Reality is that not all dive profiles fall into
>> this category.  >>
>> 
>>  Why??   What is option number one, Mike??
>
>Dive only with the rich guys that own every possible combo of gear
>so they can be "optimal" no matter what the conditions are?
>
>>  <<what happens when you want to do that profile that require
>> 15 minutes more air than you will get out of AL80's? >>
>>    
>> You only get fifteen minutes out of an al80?? I must have read that wrong.
>
>Yes Al, AMAZINGLY enough you did manage to read it wrong.  
>Amazing how you always manage to (try to) do that to your
>advantage.
>
>"15 minutes more" that means 15 minutes BEYOND the time you 
>normally get from AL80's.
>
>so if you would have gotten 25 minutes from the AL80's, then 
>for this dive that says you are wanting to get 40 minutes.
>where 40 is 15 "more" than 25.
>
>Nice try though.
>
>> << At first you claimed it was for deco safety, now there are repeated
>> references to backup buoyancy for the heavier tanks.>>
>> 
>>  The drysuit does both Mike,  BOTH,  if something can do two functions I can
>> carry one less thing. 
>
>Yes, but you are assuming there is a need for a drysuit.  If there
>is no need, then a 2nd bladder would be simpler.  Or certainly
>no more complex.
>
>>   So why dont you listen to him, Mike??  Hmmmmmmmmm?? 
>
>Because I forgot to attend the "lemming" class, and when I see an 
>inconsistancy, I point it out.
>
>Because as good as these guys are, they have also shown themselves
>to be prone to hyperbole from time to time.
>
>> << not all dives will be done under "optimum" conditions.>>
>> 
>>    Again Mike you have missed the boat. You never have to dive. Ever. Just
>
>Interesting proposition Al, from on hgh you decree that if you
>cannot dive "optimally" you should not dive at all... 
>
>> dive.  You have same deal Mike, you can dive when you want to and only then.
>> If your gear is not right, THEN CHANGE YOUR GEAR. If it is not right, 
>whatever
>> "it" might be , then DONT DIVE. 
>
>Sorry Al, I know you'd like to get away with being a hypocrite but 
>remember I don't the holier-than-thou stuff doesn't wash when you 
>try to have it both ways at the same time.
>
>Now this is petty I grant you, but you're the one spouting (or 
>regurgitating) this fire and brimstone about optimal-only diving, 
>not me...
>
>In this case I am curious to examine some comments you made in another 
>thread.... on 7/16 you wrote to Tom Mount in Re: Fw: cylinders-BC's etc
>
>"I (Al) went in, diving my hp steel 100's in as near a hogarthian fashion 
>as I could.."                                   ^^^^
>
>Al, this sounds awfully like a less than "optimal" configuration.
>What does "near" mean?  I thought you said if you can't do it
>right, you stay dry and play golf?  
>
>As a lemming I learned long long ago that HP steel tanks are 
>only for strokes.  I can dig out quotes from George I am sure.
>
>I'm being sarcastic there, but hey if you want to tow-the-line
>and quote rule #1 and play Mr. Perfect, ya gotta answer to your
>own music.
>
>Being rigidly judgemental really sucks when you forget to make 
>sure you don't fall under your own criticism.
>
>Now personally I think they are possibly just less than optimal.
>But under the logic you have been using to damn the OMS wings
>I'd say these tanks have to go.
>
>Al, you claimed you wanted to explore the issues not blast
>anyone, you wanted to learn about the OMS as if you had not
>drawn any conclusions already.  I'd say it seems you had
>your conclusions long before this thread started and
>simply are trying to find ways to justify them.  Otherwise
>you might have been willing to allow that yes there are conditions
>though less than optimal where a 2nd bladder could be useful
>in the event there is no need for a drysuit.
>
>Mike
>--
>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>


 -------------------------------------------------------------------
 Learn About Trimix at http://www.cisatlantic.com/trimix/trimix.html


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]