Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 18:39:08 -0400
From: "Katherine V. Irvine" <kirvine@sa*.ne*>
Organization: DIR
To: Rubrifolia@ao*.co*
CC: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: Another NE Death
Putting helium in the gas shortens the deco. The only excuse for air
is still ignorance. Option Number One says " Don't Dive". If I can not
do it right, I "Don't Dive". I generally mix only 50-60 helium wtih 12
oxygen for eveything cave, and 50-60 helium with 17-19 oxygen for
eveything ocean, unless I am single tank diving , in which case it it
30/30 and we stay shallow. The 17-19 stuff requires NO deco gas, but you
can use it if you want to accelerate the deco or do more dives.

  I only dive my "project" once in a great while - the rest of the WKPP
actually does all of the diving . I think I have done less than ten
dives with the WKPP this year. We have 100 guys, they do not need me to
be there , and there are so many sites I could not possibly be there all
of the time. True, sonme REQUIRE that I be there, but we do not dive
those very often.

  My big thing is ocean diving. 

Rubrifolia@ao*.co* wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 98-07-19 07:50:34 EDT, kirvine@sa*.ne* writes:
> 
> << Actually, diving air and 50 50 is less narcotic than diving 32
nitrox.
>  however, this is a "mute" point since only a stroke does either one. The
>  correct thing to do is dive trimix for that dive with NO deco gas at
>  all.
> <snip>
>   We use air for NOTHING. We use the lowest AED we can get wtih the gas
>  banks. We dive PPO2's in the 1 to 1.2 range. We do the deco according to
>  reality, not fear and loathing. But then, we have much different results
>  than the rest of you , now don't we?
> 
>  Rubrifolia@ao*.co* wrote:
>  >
>  > In a message dated 98-07-17 06:43:55 EDT, you write:
>  >
>  > << the even more insane practice of
>  >  diving air on the back and mix in a stage, we can expect many people to >>
>  >
>  > so whats so bad about diving air and using 50 50 for the deco?  for ex on a
>  > 130 ft wreck .....seems to me to be better than all these people coming out
>  > and doing 130 on 32EAN......
> 
>  don't get cranky now....the ex is a 130 ft wreck dive, 'cause that sort of an
> everyday....now if i did the math right....the po2 for 130 on air is
> l.04...the 50 50 nicely accelerates the deco time....trust me when I say that
> no one is afraid of doing deco, just that we don't get to sit on tree logs, we
> are in the open ocean and fairly aware of the contingencies that
> apply.......plus the fact that boats have schedules and there are just so many
> people that can comfortably fit on one anchor lline and and and....so say 50
> minutes w/50 50 gets you 53 minutes of line time.....40 gets you 37  and 30
> gets you 23 minutes....CNS% is 18, 14 and 10 respectively......whats so bad
> about that?
> 
> plus air can be more flexible re changed boat destinations which happens alot
> up here ....Captains and conditions change their minds...this is not  strokery
> just dealing with the everyday facts of dive life up here.....I am not arguing
> about trimix for deeper stuff, I used mix this year for the first time on the
> Doria and totally agree for that application, but for everyday use in the 100
> to 130 range, I don't see your point yet.......
> 
>  yes one could say your results are different from ours, but then you can
> exercise much more total control  over divers and destinations... as I
> understand it, you are running a project --a project, not a weekend day out on
> the water--- that happens to utilize the 'sport' of diving as one of its
> tools.....and yes, very well and with great results.....


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]