Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Tue, 07 Jul 1998 11:36:13 -0400
From: "Thomas A. Easop" <tomeasop@mi*.co*>
Organization: EPI
To: Adriaan_Haine@ce*.be*
CC: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: Drysuit vs wetsuit WAS/Bouyancy Test
Diving dry would be the best way to go, unless you are someplace really warm
where you would overheat in a drysuit. By realy warm I mean like Bikini, where
water temp is 85 degrees F at 10 fsw and at 180fsw.

Adriaan_Haine@ce*.be* wrote:

> You wrote:
>
> '<SNIP> At 200 fsw the wet suit will be almost fully compressed and will
> have lost almost all of its additional buoyancy. In order to get down there
> in
> the first place with this wet suit you needed to add some lead on a belt,
> or
> elsewhere. The lead is still just as negative at 200 fsw but the suit is
> now not
> as positive. If your wings cannot provide the needed lift to get you up to
> where
> the wet suit starts to add some buoyancy again, you're stuck on the
> bottom.<SNIP>'
>
> Why not leave the wetsuits to the recreational divers. With the amount of
> time a diver on atechnical dive spends
>  in the water, I feel  a drysuit (made of trilaminate or some other
> none-compressable material) makes more sense.
>  By doing so, you virtually eliminate the 'cold' factor, and it is much
> safer in the buoyancy control area, since the
>  buoyancy of this type of suit does not change with the depth.
>
> Greetings,
> Adri Haine



--
Guns and Armour of SCAPA FLOW
1998 Underwater Photographic Survey of Historic Wrecks
http://www.gunsofscapa.demon.co.uk


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]