Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 21:22:03 +1000
From: Christian Gerzner <christiang@ta*.co*.au*>
To: "techdiver@aquanaut.com" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: THAT fatality and TechTraining (was Re: Does IANTD
     believe an instructor should NOT pursue a sinking
     student?
There is one aspect to this whole truly sad state of affairs which
disturbs me, for one, greatly.

A number of posts have alleged that the victim (and I use that word
advisedly if with some reservation, the jury is not yet in) had logged
less than 100 dives during the whole of her diving career. If this is
true, and I guess Alan Pelstring could confirm or deny this, I seriously

question how it can be that she was able to, "sanctioned" is perhaps a
better way of putting it, take part in a course such as the one on which

she died. If these allegations are NOT true, please hit the delete
button right now, otherwise please excuse the bandwidth.

I would think that Jane, and I do hope that I do not offend anyone's
sensibilities by referring to the victim by name, like all the other
relatively new divers I have known would have included her training
dives with her recreational dives to a sum total of <100. Now Jane was,
in this instance, doing a trimix course, which means that she would have

previously done a EAN course, and before that a master diver course, and

before that ... you get, I trust, my drift. All of these require
training dives under supervision.

So just how many truly recreational dives did Jane, and the rest of the
Janes of this world for that matter, actually do before she embarked on
her Trimix course? Just who, or which organisation within the parameters

of its criteria, was it that allowed/permitted/sanctioned her
participation on this course? Exactly what are/were their criteria?

Excuse me, but am I the only voice in the wilderness to suggest that
less than 100 dives (including training dives) is not exactly a panacea
for qualification for a demanding course such as this?

I, for one, think it most unlikely that ANYONE has the necessary
experience to undertake this kind of activity with this number of dives
under their weight belt. NOBODY, not even the WKPP and I am sure that
they would agree with me here, CAN TEACH EXPERIENCE indeed I much doubt
that the WKPP would remotely entertain instruction at this level to
people this experienced, or rather, to people with so little experience.

So, OK, the usual disclaimers. I don't know from diddly squat the real
criteria of the various training (at whatever level) agencies, nor those

of the WKPP. As well I am, even though it is as a result of a particular

incident, speaking in generalities. Nevertheless I do know what I
demand/expect of my colleagues in my far more humble and limited sphere
of diving and I do know that a <100 dive experienced diver is not in my
book, nor that (and I am sure that I can speak for them in this
instance) of my peers, particularly experienced.

May I also take this opportunity to add, for what little it may be
worth, my belated condolences to Alan Pelstring and Jane's family and
other friends.

Christian



--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]