Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Fri, 01 May 1998 10:01:00 -0400
From: Jeff Bentley <jbentley@cr*.co*>
To: "William M. Smithers" <will@tr*.co*>
CC: KybrSose <KybrSose@ao*.co*>, cobber@ci*.co*, SHPWRK@ao*.co*,
     techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: just when you thought
Vanna... sell this man a vowel... and a clue..

Only a seriously demented stroke would consider this covoluted piece
of bat guano.

If you are diving with a buddy you don't need some little wuss bottle. You can
use the gas of your buddy to ascend safely.

If you are solo diving you don't bring some little cheese 2 breath bottle
either.
You bring something more significant based on the depth. In < 50' do you need
to increase your complexity when you can make a free ascent?

You are a bonehead Will,
Jeff

William M. Smithers wrote:

> On Fri, 1 May 1998, KybrSose wrote:
> > Both tanks are tied together by a pressure hose. When that hose blows<
and we
> > all know it will>  You lose both gas supplies. You have to shut your primary
> > and the little bottle does not have a valve. If the second free flows you
cant
> > shut it off and you are losing your only source of gas.  A first stage
failure
> > is covered by the  little bottle but the dreaded tank neck o ring failure is
> > still there. But if you dont maintain your first, are you going to maintain
> > this thing? You cant hand it to another diver.
> >
>
> You are missing the point - only a moron would leave it attached to
> the primary during the dive.  You boost the pressure when it needs
> to be refreshed, then disconnect the thing - easy filling.
>
> > Then there is the mindset behind this thing. You can't pay attention to your
> > gas supply?  You shouldnt be in the water.  If this is only for emergency
use
> > then shouldnt it be bullet proof??
>
> Again, you're missing the point.  The presumption is that of main
> supply failure, which is a fair assumption if you have are diving
> singles.  A check valve is pretty reliable - again, considering
> the nature of recreational diving.
>
> > If your plan is suck your main dry and
> > shoot straight up fine. If its suck your main dry and ascend on the pony
fine.
> > But then you need enuff gas to ascend safely and a 13 is the edge of that
> > envelope. The outer edge.  This will give you what ten twelve breaths from
120
> > fsw?. Just slightly better than a spare air suppository.  And we all know
this
> > will wind up at that depth in the hands of that diver.
> >
>
> Al, it is always wise to do the math before making a
> strong statement - especially when you know you're dealing with
> people who do the math regularly.
>
> At an RMV of 0.5 cfm, you will get about three minutes at 120 fsw
> from an AL13. But in the event of a failure, as a recreational
> no-deco diver, you won't be at depth anything like 3 mins - you'll
> start the ascent immediately.  If you start the ascent immediately,
> and assuming an ascent rate of 30fpm, you will use about 7.0 cu. ft of
> gas to get to the surface - about half of your AL13.  Add in some minor
> decompression and/or a safety stop, and you still have enough gas.
>
> Same holds true even if you plan for a hooverish 0.7 cu. ft. RMV,
> although you are going to have to trim your safety stop (which
> is just that - for safety, and holds a very small probability
> of inducing bends if it is blown off - and the resulting bends
> are rarely if ever life-threatening anyway).
>
> >  If you have a real pony you can switch to it and motor home. This is a
> > convolution, right up there with bungee wings, 80/20, metal to metal, poodle
> > jackets and curb feelers on the sides of your doubles.  It's crap.
> >
>
> My point: dont't do a classic knee-jerk by sucking Hogarthian dick here.
> The right tool for the right job - and dive circumstances.  I stick:
> for recreational diving, it's a whole different ball of wax - don't
> be so quick to pass judgement with the eyes of a technical
> diver - that is called hubris - or have you forgotten your roots?
>
> -Will
>
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.



--
Jeff Bentley     jbentley@cr*.co*    http://www.crl.com/~jbentley


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]