Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 15:12:40 +0200 (MET DST)
To: Arclight <arclight@ex*.co*>
From: Hans Petter Roverud <proverud@on*.no*>
Subject: Re: Nitrox...Cutting through the BS
Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com
At 20:32 20.04.98 -0700, you wrote:
>
>
>     Okay, I know there is a huge amount of hype over "Oxygen clean and
>compatible."  I knwo that if you are getting partial-pressure blends, it is
>a good idea to have your tanks O2 serviced.  My question now is about
>regulators.  For EAN that is 40% or less, what should I REALLY be doing?
>Do I need new o-rings in all of my lines?  Do my 1st and 2nd stage need to
>be serviced?  
>     I seem to get a different answer from everyone I talk to, ranging from 
>
>"Our equipment should never be used with EAN, best get our new green-body,
>dedicated Nitrox regulator that is good up to 21% Oxygen" 
>
>to 
>
>"I use whatever regulator I want for my 100% O2."  
>
>For basic Nitrox work, what should I do?  I was looking to buy a new reg
>soon, either a Sherwood Oasis or one of the Scubapro G-series.  Are either
>of these going to be a problem?  Thanks,
>
>
>
>John Norman
>arclight@ex*.co*

The general rule is air standard up to 40% and oxygen clean and compatible
beyond 40%. Thus, a special ultra-clean dedicated reg for bottom mix is not
needed; there's no point to buying a nitrox version. Further, most (possibly
all) regs will function just fine with 100%. Theoretically, standard lubes
in the first stage may cause an explosion but the practical problems are
more likely long-term compatibility. You may find that O-rings and plastics
deteriorate a lot faster. I've used nitrile O-rings and changed them every 6
months since they got brittle. All experience indicates things rot rather
than going bang in a big way. The first stage regulator is the main concern
due to high pressure. There is much less need to worry about the low
pressure hoses and second stage.

My advice: Use any reg for nitrox up to 40%. Further, dedicate oxygen regs
for long-term use, either by servicing them at frequent intervals or by
switching to fully oxygen-compatible parts. Use Christolube or equivalent.
If you need a reg for a high-oxygen mix once in a blue moon I would not
hesitate to use any ordinary reg. However, I would expect to see accelerated
deterioration of O-rings, diaphragms and plastic seatings. 

The rule for partial pressure filling is similar: Oxygen clean for anything
that sees more than 100% at high pressure. Again the "off the record" advice
will be: worry more about stage cylinders that may receive 3000 psi of pure
oxygen. The amount of oxygen needed to make a 32% or a 40% mix is a much
lesser concern. As long as it's filled slowly oxygen first we're talking 750
psi of oxygen max. In the latter case I wouldn't worry too much about an
occasional single-filtered air fill provided the cylinder valve was
lubricated with a non-flammable lube in the first place. (If you fill air of
a quality poor enough to cause explosions you'd better not breathe it anyway).

Avoid heat (fast filling) and adiabatic compression (shocking the gas by
closing a valve fast). If it's all rocket science clean anything may pass
but in practice it's a lot easier to ensure safe handling by going gentle.
It's amazing what burns in pure oxygen if you do it all wrong -- and, it's
reassuring what works if you avoid shock filling and heat. (Quarter turn
"quick" valves have probably caused more oxygen explosion than anything
else. The recipe for disaster is, establish a violent flow rate and block it
in a split-second by turning the handle 90 degrees).

Conclusion: Oxygen will make incompatible materials deteriorate; it hardly
ever causes explosions unless you do something way stupid. It still makes
sense to strive for high compatibility to avoid failure. At the risk of
sounding careless, I think we should focus more on long-term performance in
oxygen service rather than worrying about explosions. As divers realize the
explosion hazard is exaggerated they may think it's all bogus. In reality,
it's more a question of how long components will last. Unless you are
willing to accept frequent service intervals the conclusion stays the same
-- go fully oxygen compatible at high oxygen pressures.

regards,

Hans



  

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]