At 11:33 PM 4/9/98 -0400, you wrote: >True/False. > >OK first, "or" makes this two statements, making the entire question >false if either individual statement is false. What we >get is: No, that's AND. OR Truth Table A B Result ------------------ F F F T F T F T T T T T Where did you get your Computer science training? :P > >[1] "Oxygen can be employed to increase safety regarding DCS" > >Clearly, this is true. > >[2] "it can be used to shorten decompression time by permitting the diver to >conduct the 10fsw stop at 20fsw." > >The statement "it can be used to shorten decompression time" >is also obviously true, which is what I think you were >getting at with your deco examples. Again, nobody is >going to argue with that part - obviously O2 can be >used for accellerated decompression. > >The problem comes with the next part; "by permitting the diver to >conduct the 10fsw stop at 20fsw" which describes HOW it is >that it can be used to shorten deco. > >IANTD uses Bulhmann tables in the manuals, and promotes >Buhlmann-based deco software packages. >I assume TDI does as well. > >The simple fact is that if you are using Buhlmann, >and you are breathing pure O2, conducting the 10fsw stop >at 20fsw will not make one second of difference in >your hang time. > >And that makes the second part false, which makes >the entire statement false - which makes the answer "FALSE". > >If somebody doesn't believe this, I suggest they >*try* it. Run a profile with 100% 02 for deco >starting at 20ft, using Voyager, Decom, ZPlan, >or whatever, which are all Buhlmann ZHL16-based >software packages. Most of these can combine >your 10 and 20ft stops into one long stop. > >Run it both ways - you'll see there's virtually no >deco difference. > >And to address the minless wanderings of this thread, >let me once again repeat: > >This has nothing to do with whether or not Buhlmann >ZHL16 is correct in this regard. It is the model >used to instruct students, and the model used >by 99% of recreational "technical" divers, and is >therefore the basis with which we must answer this >exam question. > >And to further repeat: while there is some evidence >that higher PO2 by itself can be useful >in shortening deco times, there aren't any models >that explain why or exactly how. > >Even the stuff about "oxygen window", (a very misused >term) does not explain it. Oxygen Window refers >to a theory called "zero supersaturation ascent", which >is basically a play on total tissue saturation >that relies on the fact that due to metabolic >consumption, you always have an O2 pressure >deficit in the deeper tissues, which is >normally 8-13% below ambient. Your body >relies on this pressure differential to move the O2 from >blood to tissues. > >You can pack this extra "room" below saturation with >excess N2 or He. But it's not that simple, >as the saturation deficit increases linearly >with depth, and if you *use* that extra room, >you've got to vent off the N2 overload >in a conventional way before ascending, which >ultimately gets back to tissue half-times >and off-gassing gradients (recently modified >by the bubble theorists). > >Anyway, the upshot is that "zero supersaturation" >and "oxygen windos" were popular themes with >commercial dive theorists in the seventies, but >it does not by itself get around the problem >that an off-gassing gradient can't go higher >than 100%, which is the core of the theoretical snag >when it comes to explaining how pure o2 is more >effective at depth, when it should be depth-independant, >since once you get on pure O2, your off-gassing gradient >is maxed, no matter how deep you are. > >So the mystery is unexplained. > >-Will > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: RMC <brownies@ne*.ne*> >> To: Tom Mount <TOM.MOUNT@wo*.at*.ne*> >> Cc: William M. Smithers <will@tr*.co*>; Jesse Armantrout >> <armantrout@wo*.at*.ne*>; Tech Diver <techdiver@aquanaut.com>; >> cavers@ww*.ge*.co* <cavers@ww*.ge*.co*> >> Date: Thursday, April 09, 1998 11:18 AM >> Subject: Re: Lovely >> >> >> >Tom, >> > >> >You could just do it our way and run a fixed gas (30/30) for the 100/100 >> >bottom time and hit O2 for 15 minutes at 20 feet with a ascent time in >> >excess of 8 minutes to get to 20 feet from the bottom. As you know this >> >is one of our favorite weekly Fort Lauderdale dives during the summer >> >and we routinely utilize the triple reef lines to make our deco more >> >enjoyable. The most effective runs to date have been scootering accross >> >the 60-80 reef for 10 minutes on the way to the shallower reefs where we >> >grab our last few lobster's in 30 feet and get out. We have even done >> >this on bottom mix with slightly longer shallow times. >> > >> >You should join us this summer and see how simple our "tek" dives have >> >become. I have three spare Gavins charged at all times in addition to my >> >old Gavin. I really think this is the most fun you can have in single >> >Saturday dive. >> > >> >Have a good weekend, >> > >> >RMC >> > >> >Tom Mount wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> 5 run a constant po2 of 1.2 and deco on 1.4 the runtime is 134 minutes >> >> Tom >> > >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: William M. Smithers <will@tr*.co*> >> >> To: Jesse Armantrout <armantrout@wo*.at*.ne*> >> >> Cc: Tech Diver <techdiver@aquanaut.com>; cavers@ww*.ge*.co* >> >> <cavers@ww*.ge*.co*> >> >> Date: Wednesday, April 08, 1998 11:30 PM >> >> Subject: Re: Lovely >> >> >> >> > >> >> >On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Jesse Armantrout wrote: >> >> >> >From the 1996-1997 TDI Exams Book - Decompression Procedures Exam - >> page >> >> >> 1 - question 7: >> >> >> >> >> >> 7. Oxygen can be employed to increase safety regarding DCS or it >> can >> >> >> be used to shorten decompression time by permitting the diver to >> conduct >> >> >> the 10fsw stop at 20fsw. >> >> >> True/False. >> >> >> >> >> >> TDI Answer: False >> >> >> >> >> >> The track record speaks for itself. >> >> > >> >> >I didn't do my tech training with TDI, so I can't >> >> >speak for their record or training first hand, >> >> >but actually, the answer to the above question >> >> >is "False" according to most deco models, including >> >> >Bulhmann, which is the predominant deco model >> >> >used for decompression today (WKPP secret funky homebrew aside). >> >> > >> >> >According to the Buhlmann model, there is >> >> >absolutely no deco difference between >> >> >breathing O2 at 20, 10, or 60ft - depth won't >> >> >shorten your hang time. >> >> > >> >> >Why? Well, under Buhlmann, the only thing >> >> >that makes a difference in your deco time >> >> >is the partial pressure of N2 and/or He in your >> >> >deco mix, as this affects the relative >> >> >gradient between the gas dissolved in your tissues >> >> >and the partial pressure of the gas it is >> >> >working against (what you are breathing). And *that* >> >> >affects your off-gassing rate. >> >> > >> >> >Your PN2 will vary with depth, so as long as you are >> >> >breathing a mix that contains *any* N2 or He, depth >> >> >matters, but as soon as you go onto 100% O2, there is no >> >> >diluent in the mix, so depth makes absolutely no >> >> >difference - you are at your maximum off-gassing gradient, and >> >> >because there's no He or N2 in the mix, the >> >> >partial pressure of these gasses can't increase. >> >> > >> >> >-Will >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> >-- >> >Robert M. Carmichael >> > >> >http://www.browniedive.com SSA, Mixed Gas & Tank Fill Compressors >> >http://www.halcyon.net Rebreathers, Harness Backplate & Wings >> >http://www.selfrescue.com Responsible Diver Self Rescue P.S.A. >> > >> >"Simplify diving and restore the ADVENTURE.................Do it Right" >> >> > > -------------------------------------------------- Kevin Connell <kevin@nw*.co*> Northwest Labor Systems http://www.nwls.com Bellingham, WA -------------------------------------------------- -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]