Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "ECLAYTON123" <eclayton123@em*.ms*.co*>
To: "Andrew Drapp" <andrew@ce*.co*.jp*>, "Drew Mooney" <dmooney@cy*.ne*>
Cc: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: Independent doubles and the long hose
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 08:05:11 -0500
If you"re considering the long hose and gas for your buddy,  why not put the
long hose on a large pony or sling bottle 30cuft or larger .  Take that
bottle along and hand it off to him if slung or give him the hose if you
mount it.

Ed Clayton
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Drapp <andrew@ce*.co*.jp*>
To: Drew Mooney <dmooney@cy*.ne*>
Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Date: Monday, February 23, 1998 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: Independent doubles and the long hose


>
>> Another of my points is that when you dive independants, you complicate
the
>> long hose thing. How do you determine which tank gets the short hose?
>
>I was putting the long hose on the right hand post.  That just made the
>hose routing a little simplier.  I don't see much of a practical
>difference on which post it goes on.  I am assuming that when I need to
>donate air, it is my buddy that has had the problem, and not myself.
>
>> So what if you're on a dive and you lose
>> all the air out of one tank, and wonder of wonders, a buddy has the same
>> thing happen to his entire supply? Buddy breathe?
>
>So, tell me, what do you do if your buddy has a manifold failure, and
>loses all of his gas, and you have a reg failure and lose a post (the one
>with the long hose)?  The exact same situation.  You defined a problem
>with 3, count them THREE, catastrophic failures, and ask me how I deal
>with that?  Talk about boogie man.  But, since you asked, I would just
>buddy breath off of the short hose.
>
>> Do you solo dive with your independants? Then a long hose becomes a moot
>> point. But I suspect that you don't and that it's not.
>
>Sometimes.  Not that often.  Mostly with a buddy.
>
>> Please explain your situation.
>
>I assume you mean about why I am using independents?  I really didn't want
>to get into it, but since you asked, here it is.
>
>I live in Japan.  Here, due to different regulations, owning tanks is
>prehibitively expensive.  An AL80 will run around $500US.  Larger steel
>tanks are more.  Manifolds also cary a premium, and would require getting
>certified by the government since they would have to be imported.  I
>estimate the cost for a set of manifold doubles at around $2000US.  The
>typical format is to rent tanks at dive sites.  Becase of this, airfills
>are largely nonexistant.  Also, due to past corruption and strong ties to
>the Japanese mob, the fishing union actually controls the oceans in
>Japanese waters.  To be able to dive, you have to get permission from the
>fishing unions.  "Diving services" have been setup, which got permission
>from the unions, and you pay the diving service for the right to dive
>there.  They give a cut to the fishing unions.  To keep people from just
>showing up and diving, most places require that you dive with their tanks.
>So, if I did actually shell out the $2KUS for the manifold doubles, I
>wouldn't be able to use them at most dive sights near me.  Furthermore, I
>get to the dive sites I vist by train or by motorcycle.  I am not too
>interested in carying all that gear on the train, and am physically unable
>to do so on my motorcycle, so I would have to mail the stuff to the diving
>service, use it and mail it back, at an additional cost of $50-$100.
>
>So, as you can see, like I origionaly said, diving manifold doubles is not
>an option with me.
>
>Now, back to my point, what to do with the long hose after switching away
>from it.  I have gotten several posts privetly and the answers are
>sumerized as follows:
>
>1.  Just use two short hoses.  (most common responce)
>2.  Put the long hose in the necklace, and clip off the short hose.  I was
>doing the opposite.  Interesting idea, and something I will try on the
>next dive.
>3.  Use one back tank, and sling the other tank.
>4.  Carry three seconds.  Stuff the long hose second, and use the two
>short hose seconds.
>
>Personally I like the first two better for ease of use.  The 3rd option
>seems nice, but kinda annoying during the dive.  Option 4 doesn't seem
>like too good of an idea, which the origional sugester also thought was a
>bad idea.
>
>Andrew Drapp
>
>
>--
>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.



--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]