The student had 83 dives? I don't have it in front of me, but I'm pretty sure the IANTD 97 standards stated 200 dives minimum to enter the trimix course. --------------------------------------- Kevin Connell <kevin@nw*.co*> Northwest Labor Systems http://www.nwls.com --------------------------------------- On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Dan Volker wrote: > Its been close to one month since the worst disaster in tech diving > history, an IANTD training dive, which left three divers dead, on a training > dive along a zero current > occulina reef at 250 feet, on a day with good visibility .. > > So far, George Irvine, Bill Mee, Robert Carmichael, Errol Kailachi, and > myself, have done a total of over a dozen dives, and are still actively > searching. We seem to be getting closer to the original description provided > by the lone survivor, Larry Roth. > > We have amassed enough dives to create a considerably accurate map of the > reef, from .86 miles upcurrent of the Classic Barge, to well over a mile > downcurrent. > > > Why has Divers Supply not contributed to our search for the bodies so far, > and why did they attempt to prevent our search??? > Some people have suggested > that DS is afraid we may find evidence which will be terribly incriminating. > Perhaps this is the reason they feel its appropriate for them to behave in a > manner which most of us find morally deviant, in that they show no public > responsibility for this tragedy, and feel its not their place to assist in > the recovery of the bodies. Perhaps this justifies their position that > these people died because technical diving is dangerous. Maybe what they > mean to say is that "their version" of IANTD structured technical diving is > dangerous. And is their shameful lack of respect for wishes of the families > of the dead divers, justified by the potential liability they may face > later???? Someone needs to tell Dick McNatt that if you want to dance, you > have to pay for the music... > And after releasing Press Releases, in which > they claimed they were operating under the wishes of the families, and it > then became apparent that they had had no such communication with the > families, as they had reported, their intent becomes clearer and clearer. > We have learned of terrible violations in safety proceedures, voiolations > which occurred daily at this shop. We have learned of the mass marketing of > technical diving, by Divers Supply, in which the concept of screening seems > to be lost----in the case of the dead student, Mike elkins, the poor guy had > about 83 dives under his belt. > Apparently their instructor routinely believed it was safe and intelligent > to do technical dives with no float ball, and no safety diver, even while > training students with little experience. It would also appear that neither > Andre Smith, Divers Supply, IANTD, or Tom MOUNT, are intelligent enough to > be aware of the severe reduction in gas exchange efficiency, which will > occur in divers with obesity to the extent seen in Andre Smith, or with > smokers, especially heavily overweight smokers. How can a training agency > like IANTD ignore such a fundamental element of physiology, particularly as > it could have contributed heavily in a tragic multiple death such as this > one----where Andre and Elkins were at extreme risk, in CO2 elimination, due > to their low VO2 max capabilities---which would have been incredibly easy to > test for, and in so doing, may well have saved Claypool's life, by not > putting him on a deep dive with two people who had less gas exchange > capability at this depth than was reasonably safe. Tom, you need to get > real here---just because you surround your self with fat slobs in your > agency, and in those very close to you, is no reason to condone > certification of people who are medically unfit to dive deep. If you don't > agree with me here, I have an extremely good method of proving this concept, > and I'd be happy to share it with the group. > Back to the other issues. > Gear choices seemed to have been motivated by whim, fancy, or commisions on > a sale, anything but choice of what is best for technical diving. So Where > is Tom Mount while this is going on???? So Tom, Why haven't we heard you > telling us that IANTD would never sanction Divers Supply taking a new diver > with 83 dives to his credit, on a 250 foot trimix dive??? Why haven't we > heard you insisting that IANTD, KNOWS that you don't match 4 steel 98's to > a wetsuit on a 250 foot dive, where any diver with even recreation skill > levels will know that the wet suit will lose all bouyancy, and the tanks > will be like sea anchors----Tom, surely this is NOT an area IANTD can omitt > from its training---surely you teach something in the way of intelligent > choice of gear for a dive being planned. Is this why you allow "personal > preference" in gear??? > And where is it, in the IANTD handbook, where you explain how it is OK to do > 250 foot deep drift dives with no float ball. My personal expectation of a > training agency, is that it would suggest or mandate certain proceedures in > a dive plan, that are likely to result in grave consequences if omitted. > Having no float ball and NO Safety diver, certainly sounds to me like a > violation of a Categorical Imperative. Tom, you need to either back up > Divers Supply and the behaviors and attitudes they represent, or you need to > Jump up and say they were WAAYYY outside the rules you have set up. You > need to get clear on this before the shit really starts hitting the fan, as > if it hasn't already. > Dan Volker > > > > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. > -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]