>*. The first, and more precise, begins with a cardiocatherization. Dye-- >radioactive dye, I think--is injected into the heart, and a monitor--a >fluoroscope?--is used to determine how the dye is circulated. Itself dangerous. ANY iatrogenic procedure CAN and usually DOES introduce air into the circulation, even moreso if a vein is catheterised. >*. The second, and less precise, involves the use of Doppler (?) radar, >and placement of electrodes on various parts of the chest. > >The second test is really no big deal--it's not an invasive procedure. >The first test--well, I had one done way back when I was in college, and >*that* was more complicated, but I experienced no unpleasant side effects. I'll bet you don't get DCI very often either. To get the best signal the radiographer will inject a 'contrast medium'. For echocardiography they shake up a bottle of saline and inject that. The saline of course is full of 'micro' bubbles; often very visible bubbles... /rat ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ shelps@ac*.ma*.ad*.ed*.au*|Stephen Helps PhD Ack! ___/| FAX (08)232-3283 |Anaesthesia & Intensive Care \O.o| Voice (08)224-5495 |University of Adelaide =(___)= |ADELAIDE, 5005, South Australia U ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "I believe OS/2 is destined to be the most important operating system, and possibly program, of all time" Bill Gates, CEO, Microsoft Corporation ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]