Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: techdiver@santec.boston.ma.us
Subject: Re: NITROX DECOMPRESSION
From: Julius.Loennechen@ju*.ui*.no* (Julius Loennechen)
Date: Wed, 19 May 1993 09:10:31 +0100
reply NITROX DECOMPRESSION
by the author of the original posting

I+ve got these equations for the +oxygen window+ or +inherent unsaturation+:

DELTA = P N2 - p N2 - B = P - P O2 - P CO2 - P H2O - p N2

Capital P denotes separated gas/ambient pressure
Lower case p denotes tension/dissolved gas
B = mechanical pressure; a tissue constant of compliance or resistance
against deformation. If a bubble is tightly packed, this will to some
extent prevent its growth.

A guy named Harris has found the sum of P O2, P CO2 and P H2O to equal
approximately 5.47 fsw

p N2 is equal to:  f ( P - P H2O ) fsw = f ( P - 2.04 ) fsw
f = fraction/decimal percentage of nitrogen

Thus,

P - P O2 - P CO2 - P H2O - p N2
P - 5.47 - f ( P - 2.04 ) fsw
P - 5.47 - fP + f2.04 fsw
P - fP + f2.04 - 5.47 fsw
( 1 - f )P + f2.04 - 5.47 fsw

( 1 - nitrogen fraction ) equals oxygen fraction. This is the significant
part of the equation. When I omitted the rest for simplicity I was left
with the oxygen fraction times total pressure or P O2.

I said that air at 130 feet had an oxygen window of about 1 atmosphere or
33 feet.
That+s  .21 times 5 atmospheres absolute ( ATA ) = 1.05 atmospheres
or         .21 times ( 130 + 33 ) feet absolute = 34.23 feet

Let+s do the whole equation:

( 1 - f )P + f2.04 - 5.47 fsw
( 1 - .79 )(130 + 33 ) + .79( 2.04 ) - 5.47 fsw
34.23 + 1.6 - 5.47 fsw = 30.36 fsw

The actual oxygen window is slightly less than P O2 - 3.87 feet less. Thus,
P O2 is a practical and fairly accurate approximation, especially at depth.
For smaller oxygen windows, 3.87 feet off makes a difference.
P O2 (air) at 70 feet is approximately 21.6 feet
According to the full equation I get : 21.6 feet - 3.87 feet = 17.76 feet

At one atmosphere the oxygen window is small indeed. 
It+s: ( 1 - .79 )33 + .79( 2.04 ) - 5.47 fsw = 3.07 fsw
That means that even the seemingly insignificant altitude exposure of
flying in a pressurized air plane will cause some gas separation. When
David Story commented on my oxygen windows as shooting way beyond, he+s
probably referring to the normal, one atmosphere value.

If a physicist could give us all a better understanding of this I would
certainly appreciate it. But, to my best knowledge a practical rule is
that: (sic) `the oxygen window is, slightly simplified, the partial
pressure of oxygen at a given depth+, or in fact 3.87 feet less for air.

Another practical way of viewing this:
130 feet ( about 5 ATA ) means one atmosphere of oxygen and four of
nitrogen when breathing air.
Four atmospheres of nitrogen can give the maximum nitrogen tension caused
by four atmospheres. (Seemingly a beautifully redundant sentence, but
tension is never expressed in atmospheres since it depends on solubility as
well as pressure.)
What does it take to hold a tension caused by four atmospheres in perfect,
trouble-free solution? Four atmospheres!

Thus, subtracting one atmosphere simply +takes in the slack+ before one
actually starts to decompress - there is no supersaturation in any tissue
before one ascends shallower than four atmospheres or 100 feet.

(Note that all calculations are made with atmospheres absolute or feet
absolute - remember to include/add the sea level pressure of 1 ATA / 33
fsw.)

We never breathe 100 % inert gas, in that case there would be no +slack+
before supersaturation upon ascent. A non-diver is saturated at a P N2 of
.79 atmospheres, not 1 atmosphere which is the maximum an ambient pressure
of one atmosphere would balance perfectly. I think this is the essence of
+inherent unsaturation+.

The higher the O2 percentage, the lower is the inert gas percentage and
more +slack+ is provided - the inert gas tension will never rise beyond the
partial pressure of the inert gas.

Nitrox 32 at 130 feet gives a P N2 of .68( 130 + 33 ) feet absolute = 111
feet absolute. What pressure does it take to keep a full load of  N2 in
solution? 111 feet absolute, or ( 111 - 33 ) feet = 78 feet
Ascending from 130 feet to 78 feet takes the nitrogen load up to the
pressure that balances the tissue tension. From there on we+re dealing with
supersaturation and the inevitable nucleation of microbubbles. At 78 feet
we+re dealing with 100 % saturation - Nitrox 32 ( 68 % N2 ) at 130 feet
corresponds to 100 % N2 at 78 feet.

One might ask, why am I talking saturation - according to m-values SCUBA
diving will never saturate anything but the fastest tissues? The same
physical laws apply for any tissue - more than 100 % saturation will
initiate gas nucleation whether that tissue be blood or cartilage. The only
difference is that fast tissues offgass a lot faster and will recover to
accept further decompression faster. If one +takes in the slack+ of the
oxygen window, the time he+ll have to spend at the ceiling in order to be
able to proceed and still avoid nucleation will depend on tissue m -
values. If we+re talking well perfused fast tissues, a couple of minutes
will do.
In practice we+ll probably break the oxygen window anyway, and accept some
amount of microbubbles. The oxygen window gets increasingly critical as one
approaches the surface - it+s practically impossible not to violate it from
30 feet and up. However, breaking it close to the surface is no big deal
since the microbubbles formed won+t undergo too much further decompression
and won+t grow to attain obstructive sizes.

But, as I wrote in my previous posting, by switching to an oxygen-richer
blend and wash out nitrogen at depth rather than undergo further reductions
in pressure (Nitrox 60 at 50 feet) most, if not all, inert gas nucleation
can be avoided. I+m actually combining the Haldanian and the
+thermodynamic+ decompression approach.

Readings: B. R. Wienke: Thermodynamic Decompression in AAUS +86 proceedings
(Diving for Science +86)
B.A. Hills 1966 A Thermodynamic and Kinetic Approach to Decompression
Sickness. Library Board of South Australia, Adelaide
A.R. Behnke 1967 The Isobaric (Oxygen Window) Principle of Decompression.
Trans. Third Annual Conf. Marine Tech. Soc. 3, 213

Hans P. Roverud

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]