Steve, Lines between divers always creates an entanglement hazard and adds to the tension of the dive if both divers are mobile - no one ever knows what it is going to do next and keeping up with avoiding several of them sounds like a nightmare. This whole picture you paint sounds like a leader with no confidence in the qualifications of his charges or perhaps with his own ability to keep up with them and control the dive. I would recommend a 3 man team in any overhead when possible. The third man is helpful if a crippled diver needs a lot of attention and help in that he can keep track of navigating the way out while the other tends to the victim. Gas management and supply is more flexible and covers the contingencies with a much greater safety margin. The opportunity for a division of labor can take some of the pressure off the diver with the most stressful job in a crisis as well. 5 starts to up the task load of managing the team to the point of diminishing returns; communication becomes time consuming because it takes longer to get the message to everyone in the team and confusion is more likely; vision ahead is often obstructed by other divers in a cave and under ice in open water the field of view that must be covered to monitor the entire team is task loading, tiring, and conducive to narcosis. In large groups divers will tend to team up into smaller groups anyway, each focusing attention on less than the entire team - organization goes to hell as soon as this happens and it is inevitable. Hope this helps, Chuck Boone -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]