G. Irvine wrote: > > The fact that you ask a question this stupid while arguing is proof that > you have no understanding of any of this. A monkey could see the need for this question based soley on the posts. I do not have the whole hogarthian picture, and I know who not to ask about it anymore, mr. helpful. > You really need to stop > yapping. Bentley is 100% correct - on both counts. You are now > approaching 15 posts with nothing but garbage - take a seat. > I am stopping, for now, as I can't get a straight answer. > Thomas A. Easop wrote: > > > > Question: > > > > If a drysuit diver with doubles and a stage is "an accident waiting to happen" for using his drysuit for all > > bouyancy control, and not using his wings, (according to Bently's post) then why is this dry suit use > > precisely the hogarthian bailout method for a wing failure and not just a dual bladder wing? > > -- > > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]