I have never heard the term "octet" defined as such. I know that was what you meant, and of course I know that Helium had a filled outer valence shell. I just thought that you were being so pompous that you deserved to be nitpicked. If "octet" is really used in this context (which I have never heard), than I admit that you were absolutely and totally right. J. Devin MacKenzie wrote: > In terms of atomic orbitals, "octet" is a term used designate a filled outer > valence shell not necessarily (but usually) "eight" electrons. For elements > on the top row of the periodic table (H, He)the electrons all have the same > two first quantum numbers meaning electrons in the row fill the same > degenerate (x2) spherical atomic orbital (1s orbital). For every other row > of the table (and the lanthanides and actinides for more subtle reasons), > the ground valence state of the terminal element (the noble gases)is > charecterized by filled s and p orbitals. Since there is one s orbital and > three p orbitals and the electron wavefunction degeneracy is two this means > eight electrons which is where the term octet comes from. However, it is > used to designate a filled valency in general. > > you really really should have known... > > I don't know how you get out of bed every morning not knowing this. > > >If He has an atomic number of 2 (which it does), it therefore has two > >protons in it's nucleus. in order to be an uncharged atom (which it is), it > >must therefore have 2 electrons orbiting the nucleus. How then can it have > >a stable octet of electrons? > > > >So what did it look like up your lab partners skirt? > > > >Ben > > > >J. Devin MacKenzie wrote: > > > >> If any of you had ever looked up from trying to > >> see up your lab partners skirt during chemistry > >> class, you might have learned that He is a noble > >> gas and is monatomic except under extreme > >> conditions (ie the surface of the sun, etc.). > >> In fact its noble gas attributes, namely a filled > >> outer octet of electrons is exaclty why it is so > >> unreactive, does not covalently bond to itself > >> or other atoms, and is so useful as an inert, > >> non-narcotic substitute for nitrogen. > >> > >> you really should have known > >> > >> -Devin > >> > >> rockets are for engineers, leave science to > >> scientists > >> -- > >> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > >> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. > > > > > > > > > > -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]