Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 17:29:17 -0500
From: "G. Irvine" <gmirvine@sa*.ne*>
Organization: Woodville Karst Plain Project
To: "William M. Smithers" <will@tr*.co*>
CC: Jim Cobb <cobber@ci*.co*>, Tech Diver <techdiver@aquanaut.com>,
     rebreather@nw*.co*
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: trimix web page
Mr. Will, your idea for the small filling is a good one. Otherwise, you
would need a very good guage, an accurate temp to figure the expansion
on the fly, and a fast hand. Good solution. - G

William M. Smithers wrote:
> 
> George,
> 
> These are really good points, especially seeing as I usually
> end up doing my gas-mixing at 11PM after a couple of beers.  :)
> A formal gas-mixing checklist is a great idea - its
> way too easy to get cavalier with a fill whip.
> 
> The problem with guaging low-o2 mixes is especially problematic
> with a CCR, since you are typically filling a dinky bottle.  After
> a bit of experimentation, I found mixing in small bottles to be
> virtually impossible.   So what I started doing is mixing up
> the Heliox or mix in a set of double 104's, then trans-filling to
> the smaller cylinders (6,12,or 30 cu ft).  At least that gives
> a greater margin of error.  And 240 cubes of mix will last
> damn-near forever on a CCR.  I mixed up a doubles-full of 10/90, and
> another of 13/44, and I expect I'll make it half way
> through next season without refilling (besides, I had to have
> *something* to do with those now-useless doubles).  That, and
> a couple of AL80's of the same mixes for OC bailout (which I will
> probably never need to use), and I'm set - travel diving aside,
> of course.
> 
> -Will
> 
> On Fri, 14 Nov 1997, G. Irvine wrote:
> 
> > Will, this 2 percent problem is not too bad when you are partial
> > pressure mixing for middle readings, like 35%, for example.You have the
> > double check of the partial pressure and the reading, and the use of the
> > gas is not a problem from either a toxicity or a decompression
> > standpoint. Where this gets tougher is maxing the real deep mixes, but
> > then the partial pressure still applies and the totals are still valid.
> > You can start to see where the rebreather becomes a problem, however.
> >
> > The big trick is to be sure you actually added the gases in mixing ,and
> > did not have a valve off while you THOUGHT you added 35 psi of oxygen,
> > or some such number, when in fact you did not, and then the miniox
> > reading seems "acceptable".
> >
> > A real good anal way of doing this proceedure is what is necessary to
> > get it right. Bill Mee and I do it together, and we have a whole
> > checklist to go through before disconnecting the tanks, and in the whole
> > process.
> >
> > Adding oxygen to a high helium mix can feel like yoiu are adding it when
> > youi are not. Just presurizing a big fill line fr9omt hat pressure to a
> > small increment higher, even with a very accurate digital guage is a
> > fooler since you can hear the gas moving even when the tank is not in
> > fact open to accept it - a real dangerous situation. You have to
> > depressurise the line afterwards and note the tank change on the same
> > guage that the system was on to begin with , and you must do it quickly.
> > There is no way the pressure has risen without the addition, even if the
> > number is thrown off by the cooling - it can not decrease.
> >
> > Little double checks like that , and then immediately throwing the
> > analyzer on the result will give you some comfort. The go and throw it
> > ont he pure helium to be sure it is not offset. A lot of work, but you
> > are always betting your life with this stuff.
> > William M. Smithers wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 13 Nov 1997, Jim Cobb wrote:
> > >
> > > > Julian-
> > > > If you are worried about it, throw in a 5% safety factor instead of a 2%
> > > > saftey factor, which is what we do when mixing in adverse conditions.
> > >
> > > You know, how many of you guys have actually read your MiniOx I manual?
> > > +-2% is what the sensor is good for.  That's 4% total, which
> > > is either pretty scary, or pretty indicative of the default conservatism
> > > that's built into modern tables and deco algorithms.
> > >
> > > The fact that it also quotes such potential "skew" factors
> > > as 0.000X% for a Helium component is *such* a joke, in light
> > > of the overall precision.
> > >
> > > -Will
> > >
> > > --
> > > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> > > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
> > --
> > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
> >
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]