The accuracy of the MiniOx I as stated in the manual is +-1% of FULL SCALE. That means that since full scale is 100%, the readings you get are within 1 percentage point of true values. If you read 34% then the actual can be from 33% to 35%. That is typical in any piece of instrumentation. The accuracy is based on a percentage of the instrument's full scale readings. The 1% I state above is based on my recollection. It may be 2% and you can figure from that similarly that a 34% reading can be actually from 32% to 36%. Andrew Drapp wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Nov 1997, William M. Smithers wrote: > > > You know, how many of you guys have actually read your MiniOx I manual? > > +-2% is what the sensor is good for. That's 4% total, which > > is either pretty scary, or pretty indicative of the default conservatism > > that's built into modern tables and deco algorithms. > > Will, > > With a +/-2% level of accuracy, the measured value will be within 2% of > the value, not 4%. Say you were measuring the F02 (OK, actually PP02) of > a mix with 10% O2. Exactly 10% O2. The reading would be somewhere > between 9.8% and 10.2% (+/-2% of the measured value.) How presice do you > need your FO2 measurements? This is UNTRUE and unsafe to assume it! As I said above, the accuracy is based on full scale. So 10% measured can be 8% to 12% if 2% is the stated accuracy. > andrew > andrew@ce*.co*.jp* > > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Dave Mabry dmabry@mi*.co* Great Lakes Maritime Institute Underwater Research Team NACD #2093 NSS-CDS #42872 -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]