On  2 Nov 97 at 17:26, Jammer Six wrote:

> Subject:       Re: The weight of air, verse 2
> Date:          Sun, 2 Nov 97 17:26:35 -0800
> From:          Jammer Six <jammer@oz*.ne*>
> To:            "Tony Matheis" <tonym510@fl*.co*>
> Cc:            "Bill Courtney" <divemed@mc*.or*>, "Russ Cleavland"
<cleavr@ao*.co*>,
>                "Tech List" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>, "Cavers"
<cavers@ge*.co*>

> >Jammer, Could you please point out the incorrect portions of this 
> >information so that the  those of us who are not as familiar with the 
> >correct weights can have the correct information.. Also what is the basis 
> >for your "correct information" vs what the mfgs put out.
> 
> The basis I've been using is George's posts to techdiver and cavers.
> 
> George has a set of 104s that are -7 and -9, while the chart claims that
> these are neutral.
> 
> OOPS, guess I better do  a search.
Funny I looked at some of the figures for steel tanks and thought that 
"zero" seemed kinda light for an empty steel tank..
Any one else have better/more accurate information regarding tank 
buoyancy??

  
> 
> ---------
> "Huh?"
>        --Jammer, 1992
> ---------
> 
> 
Cheers

Tony
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]