Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 12:45:30 -0400
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com, cavers@ge*.co*
From: techvid@ne*.co* (Brown, Christopher)
Subject: learning about deep air
Mr. (or possibly Ms.) Cole wrote:

>sure i think it would be a better idea to do anything below say 150 on
>trimix but i also want to know what will happen to me and how i should
>handle myself if something happens to me or a member of my team and i have
>to chase him down into the narc zone...

There is *no safe* way to learn 1st hand the effects of deep air *while in
the water* -- and that includes an in-water situation where your
instructor/buddy is using a non-narcotic mix. While underwater, you're in,
obviously, an unbreathable medium, so if you have a serious problem, you're
within seconds of drowning. A cold sober buddy assistant is still a long
way from being able to save your life. Most rational folks realize this by
now, right?

However, there is a military model, designed to *safely* address a similar
need (the need being: to experience and appreciate the effects of abnormal
pressures/gas on the body and mind), which has been in place for decades.
Long ago while preparing for a higher-than-recreational-limits jump, I
signed up for a high altitude chamber ride at McDill AFB. A certain number
of civilians per "lift" are accepted, based on need/interest because, after
all, we are paying for these things.

In these *extremely controlled* chamber simulations, people who may
encounter a low pressure/low oxygen situation because of their work/hobby
are provided the chance to experience the effects, recognize/appreciate
their impairment, and practice what can be done to resolve the problem.

*Nowhere* do they pretend/advertise/claim that you can *ever* perform
suitably in the abnormal environment.

Remember -- the reason it's done in a simulator is because *flying an
aircraft* is no time to learn this stuff -- just like *underwater* is no
place to learn what deep air does.

All participants are required to pass a medical before acceptance -- just a
basic one saying you don't have any pre-existing conditions/traumas that
would jeopardise your safety while going "up" or being blown back "down".
Along the way, you do things like count backwards and forwards, diddle with
simple puzzles, try to write, sing, etc. -- simple tasks that very
effectively illustrate your impairment -- not that you really care at the
time. ;-)

Fully equipped medicos are attending; in-chamber
instructors/guides/attendants are on an appropriate mix so that they are
functioning optimally; the environment is controlled precisely at all times
and can be changed back to normal almost immediately if a participant
develops a medical problem.

It seems the military and civilian aviation agencies believe this
experience, and the familiarization/recognition that comes with it, is
worth the time and expense as a *preventative* -- so that you recognize
your impairment and *relieve it immediately* --  the same kind of thinking
which is parallel to the reason many divers give for wanting to take a deep
air course. The problem, as I mentioned to start, is that there's no safe
way for divers to have a similar learning experience underwater. Efforts by
training agencies to do so, while possibly having a noble intent, simply
can't be done entirely safely in the water.

Maybe some day an agency will come up with such a chamber for simulations
or engage existing facilities to provide this service -- allowing divers to
learn what they need to know about deep air in a controlled (and dry)
situation. Sure as hell would be better than divers doing it on their own,
or "supervised", while underwater. I think it would be a popular
(read:money-making) course; safely satisfy the inquisitive/needful; improve
understanding better than any lecture, textbook, film, or internet spitball
and flame throwing; and be a tremendous service to all divers. Every diver
course would be enhanced by including a simulation and though it would add
to the expense/time, it sure would get the point across. Unfortunately, for
civilian agencies it would add to insurance costs -- something the gov't.
doesn't have to worry about because you can't sue them -- unless someone
tells a dirty joke or makes a pass at you. ;-)

(Efforts/claims to train divers to function "normally" in an abnormal
narcotic state are total horseshit and are not considered/included in the
above.)

Christopher A. Brown
The Technical Diving Video Library     deepedge.com/TechVid
Phone (US & Can.):606-272-0255; Fax:606-272-7279

Life is short -- this is not a rehearsal.



--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]