Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
Just for the pot.... To my mind EAN80 vs O2 is an issue to be taken dive by dive. Depending on the mixes carried it is sometimes not much of an advantage to use O2, and you can oftain get on to EAN80 much sooner...perhaps this fits for the mixes and volumes carried for that dive.... As for the pure EAN80 vs O2 debate...?!? Phil. ---------- > From: Kevin Connell <kevin@nw*.co*> > To: techdiver@aquanaut.com > Subject: Re: 02 Versus EAN80 for Deco. > Date: 17 September 1997 21:51 > > Unforunately no one has really grabbed this issue yet. I know O2 is the > "right" thing, but why? The benefits I've heard are ease of filling, the > down sides are CNS, less margin for error on the 20 foot stop, no > prescription bullshit. Obviously the deco obligation is about the same. > > So, pros, fill me in on the pros and cons of 02 for deco in open water. > > Thanks in advance. > > At 08:28 PM 9/15/97 -0700, breazile@ne*.co* wrote: > >I'm sure the pros will fill in the gaps once they get > >ahold of this one. > > > >Good luck, > >Jon > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Kevin Connell <kevin@nw*.co*> > > Northwest Labor Systems > http://www.nwls.com > Bellingham, WA > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]